Just out of curiosity, what would you be willing to pay for 100 hours? Would 50 cents an hour be a fair price? If you go to one of those gaming arcades, they usually charge $5 or $6 per hour to play any game they have in their library. Would the 50 cents / hour be a reasonable fee to you?
Now do the math, at 50 cents per hour for 100 hours, that adds up to $50. That's more or less the cost of a full year of 24/7/365 online gaming from Live. I've had Live for a few years now and I can only think of maybe 10 days at most, where the Live service was unavailable. Most times I wasn't able to connect, it wasn't a Live issue, it was an Internet / hydro related issue.
Lets say you are only willing to pay 25 cents per hour. Lets then say you game online for 4 hours a week. So your grand total for 16 hours of gaming is $4 per month. Multiply that by 12 months and you're at $48 (approx). You're still back up to the almost cost of the current yearly subscription fee.
Any way you look at it, I think in the end, the current pricing for Live is extremely fair value. I know how it can suck when you're in a great match with great players, then all of a sudden you disconnect and its extremely annoying. Unfortunately that's the risk. At least with the dashboard you can see your recent players and try to reconnect.
I can appreciate what you're hoping for which is a moderate Live Subscription for a lesser cost, but any way you add it up, I think we're still getting a great deal as it is now.
That's my 2 cents on the subject for what its worth.
See ya!
duviee71 wrote:
what if they kept the monthly gold but also added the hours for the ppl that only play 1 or 2 days out of a month, that way they could make everybody happy?