it was your and only your decision of buying it
it clearly says before you download
"There are no refunds for this item"
no refund
whats wrong with local? i completed the game on single player with no problem.
ill try the local co-op with a friend sometime.
Zorplex wrote:@sneaky Probably nothing. I own this game on several different medias for several consoles and only wanted it for the ability to play online with friends. The lack of online co-op is a HUGE letdown. (Also the VS is nigh unplayable as Tails)
I admit i thought there was going to be online co-op also, and i thought it was kinda disappointing, maybe they'll add it for sonic 3 if they release it on the arcade.
btw theres going to be a great co-op game in just 12 days :D
Zorplex wrote:Final comment before I take my rabble rousing elsewhere:If you are one of those few people who has never played Sonic 2 before, go ahead and buy it! The single player is still as great as ever! But anyone looking for something new in the way of online multiplayer, save your money.
DingoEnderZOE2 wrote:Co-op in this game would be pointless due to the fact that Tails in Co-op would make the game too easy because of his Invulnarablity and Sonic speed over Tails would cause the problems as well, having a Co-op with those conditions would thus make the game be unbalanced.
Co-op has always been in the game though since the Genesis days. The TC(topic creator) is only saying that the co-op is only limited to local play, and not online play as it was advertised.
i have no equal wrote:What's the problem with people wanting to control tails???? It is utterly useless and has never actually been there as a serious 2 player activity or co-op. Sonic is just too fast and anybody who needs tails' help with these bosses must be truly awful. It was only ever a little easter egg in the original games, a gimmick if you will. Never meant to really be played like that, i just wanted the game.
There's two sides to the story there. Tails is useful since he's invulnerable, but useless in the fact that he constantly goes off-screen. I recently played Sonic 3 & Knuckles with a friend over at my place, and it was surprisingly less fun than it was 10 or so years ago. Granted it's predictable that'd happen over so many years, but you can tell where Sega could make another 2D Sonic game with co-op and still make it a really fun experience; as in yes, the Genesis games could be even better. What I'm talking about is, whenever the 2nd player as Tails goes off-screen, he/she has to wait awhile or a short time before finally re-appearing to try to catch up to sonic again, rense and repeat.
It's fun, but it's not FUN. Online co-op would've made it even better, but ah well. That's Sega for you. (Geez I thought I'd never say that)
Winston441984 wrote:don't people ever try the trail first?
The trial doesn't have any multiplayer so how would they know that co-op had been lied about?
Miami Flash15 wrote:Worst arcade game i have ever bought, i cant get past the water, blocks in Chemical plant level 2!!!
i have no equal wrote: Miami Flash15 wrote:Worst arcade game i have ever bought, i cant get past the water, blocks in Chemical plant level 2!!!That has nothing to do with the game but more your lack of skill, its not a hard game i any sense. Well the emeralds are quite hard but thats as far as it goes.
Zorplex wrote:Final final comment! (maybe...)Haha! I knew someone would bring up the trial! I don't usually try games that I am anticipating to purchase or believe to be of quality: see Geometry Wars, TMNT, Bomberman, Ikaruga when it is released... this was definitely an oversight on my part! I will definitely be more wary of future purchases of arcade games.(Then again... it is only $5, I would have likely purchased it at some point even if it hadn't been advertised to have online co-op but it really is the principal of the matter.)
I was 100% sure of ST:HF
cause played the original ST
Ninjamaster907 wrote:Sure I would agree if the single player was messed up but it's not. So what if there is no online co-op? Sonic 2 is a great game and if the online co-op was the only reason you planned to buy it you need to learn how to spend your money better.
Having been told there's Online Co-op then taking the video game home to only find out - Oh, that's a misprint on the box, sorry no co-op. It degrades the value of the game's replay and degrades your overall opinion of the game when you Look forward to what's printed.
I think Armored Core 4 for the 360 had a misprint on their box, and after I beat the game I sent it right back at EB. Oh and DDR universe, what a crappy disappointment to what I was expecting.
http://live.xbox.com/en-US/profile/Achievements/ViewAchievementSummary.aspx?compareTo=RogueTadhg
was my old Xbox live name, until they introduced MSN compatabilities.
During the special stages the frame rate increases while on turns. It's enough to force me to use Save states.
Zorplex wrote:WARNING: Sonic 2 for XBLA is a bug ridden mess when it comes to online VS and is FALSELY ADVERTISED of having online co-op! Do not give SEGA or MS any more money for this abomination!EDIT: I am going to give MS a call and see if I can't get a refund. I will definitely be filing a complaint in due time whether or not I get a refund. This is blatant incompetence by all parties involved.
stfu idiot, no one forced you to buy it, ever heard of the trial game. you really are 1 of those sad idiots that try and complain about everything.