Rey owns wrote:

Let me say that COD3 is the WORST GAME IN HISTORY......


No,no,no I'm just kidding. But really it's a bad game....the worst game out of all the CoD games....but then again this game was made like in 8 months....so yeah this game sucks for CoD4 fans....and rocks for CoD3 fans....For me it sucks

cod 4 its all about random grenades and martydom, cod3 is pretty much about support gunners

---

H D A A A P 1 2 3

Nah COD3 is about skillful rifle awesomeness and vehicles and classes and then maybe support.

Either way I think support sucks.... It takes forever to get into position, it reloads slow, it takes several bullets to kill, and its a pain in the quantum singularity.

The rifle on the other hand gets cluster kills with rifle grenades, is a quick weapon and usually only takes 1-2 shots, is quick and reloads fast, and is great range. COD3 is best to me because it brought skill to the table not duck and cover, spray for points.

COD3 will always be the best COD in my opinion and I don't care what IW fanboy says I'm wrong.
I might add that the most I've got with support at a time was maybe 3 kills, and when you do get good with support its just walk, prone, shoot, walk , prone, shoot, zzzzzzzzz.

Stick to support if you want every other weapon even the bazooka is better.

---

I have been banned till 2161.
Mod abuse to the highest power. Just another example of digital fascism.

 conory wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

I have no life, so I'll come here and bash this awFUL game.

This made me lol....srry Treyarch fans but COD3 sucks\

Booo!

Keep your game of hide, shoot, hide, shoot, level up gimmicks.

I prefer the realism and skill of COD3. Oh and I never once ran into a glitch in COD3 unless I was trying to.... Mario created gaming and it also has glitches....

---

I have been banned till 2161.
Mod abuse to the highest power. Just another example of digital fascism.

 Rey owns wrote:

 conory wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

I have NO life, so I'll come here and bash this AWESOME game.

 HALOPWNSU wrote:

Nah COD3 is about skillful rifle awesomeness and vehicles and classes and then maybe support.

Either way I think support sucks.... It takes forever to get into position, it reloads slow, it takes several bullets to kill, and its a pain in the quantum singularity.

The rifle on the other hand gets cluster kills with rifle grenades, is a quick weapon and usually only takes 1-2 shots, is quick and reloads fast, and is great range. COD3 is best to me because it brought skill to the table not duck and cover, spray for points.

COD3 will always be the best COD in my opinion and I don't care what IW fanboy says I'm wrong.
I might add that the most I've got with support at a time was maybe 3 kills, and when you do get good with support its just walk, prone, shoot, walk , prone, shoot, zzzzzzzzz.

Stick to support if you want every other weapon even the bazooka is better.

cod4 and 5 do take skill you cant just play it and be good

---

H D A A A P 1 2 3

I know I did enjoy WAW/COD4 but I still don't think they feel as natural as COD3.

---

I have been banned till 2161.
Mod abuse to the highest power. Just another example of digital fascism.

 conory wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

 conory wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

I have NO life, so I'll come here and bash the WORST GAME IN HISTORY made by TREYARCH CoD4=AWESOMENESS CoD3=  Failure

 Hdaaap123 wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

Let me say that COD3 is the WORST GAME IN HISTORY......


No,no,no I'm just kidding. But really it's a bad game....the worst game out of all the CoD games....but then again this game was made like in 8 months....so yeah this game sucks for CoD4 fans....and rocks for CoD3 fans....For me it sucks

cod 4 its all about random grenades and martydom, cod3 is pretty much about support gunners

So that's why CoD4 got Game of The Year awards and 10/10, and CoD3 got -10/10....just admit it CoD4>CoD3 and Modern warfare 2 >Cod4>CoD3

 Rey owns wrote:

 Hdaaap123 wrote:

 Rey owns wrote:

Let me say that COD3 is the WORST GAME IN HISTORY......


No,no,no I'm just kidding. But really it's a bad game....the worst game out of all the CoD games....but then again this game was made like in 8 months....so yeah this game sucks for CoD4 fans....and rocks for CoD3 fans....For me it sucks

cod 4 its all about random grenades and martydom, cod3 is pretty much about support gunners

So that's why CoD4 got Game of The Year awards and 10/10, and CoD3 got -10/10....just admit it CoD4>CoD3 and Modern warfare 2 >Cod4>CoD3

I didnt know that it was cool to spew opinions as if they were facts....COD 4 sucked and was an average mediocre game that lowered the bar for shooters and FPS in general.  Nothing was new, and was the most generic MP game you could find on the market

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

 kmitchell63 wrote:

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

SP goes to Bioshock and Half Life, COD 4s SP was cliched and predictable around every bend.
No it didnt add anything new, and if I want customization I can play Vegas which has a more in depth customization.

Tell me, what exactly did COD 4 add to the genre that was new or never done before in gaming?

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!

 kmitchell63 wrote:

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

Amen Brother!!!

 Kramerllama wrote:

SP goes to Bioshock and Half Life, COD 4s SP was cliched and predictable around every bend.
No it didnt add anything new, and if I want customization I can play Vegas which has a more in depth customization.

Tell me, what exactly did COD 4 add to the genre that was new or never done before in gaming?

imo cod 4 single player is is the same upper class for sp with bioshock, half life, zelda, halo CE, goldeneye, Metal Gear Solid, cod 2, super mario 64, gears of war etc etc... Man do u even remember All ghilled up, has to be one of my all time favorite levels. From the sneeking around in the high grass while enimies are right next to you, to the dogs , to the insanly long sniper shot, then the mad dash out, the copter crash, then having to carry the captian to the amusement park defending yourself against a never ending amount of enemies... man i have no clue how u can say that this is mediocre.

 

As for what did cod 4 add that was new... well first it was the first call of duty to break away from the WW2 era and go modern. When they went to modern warfare they added new guns and technology that was never used before in a cod. Yes i know ur going to say that this is new to call of duty but not other games so im gunna add more.
Perks- I'm pretty sure cod 4 was the first to have this. stopping power, juggernaut etc, u could set ur classes to the style of game that u play
attachments- red dot, scopes, camo, 3x grenades again the same with perks u can pick which style of game u want to play
Sabotage gametype- this was new to cod 4 and it has become a popular gametype
ranking up system/prestige- new idea...ur kills points add up over time and u rank up unlocking new weapons and perks. This created a long lasting game that wouldn't get old and stale.
Challenges-  made gameplay more interesting made u use different guns
Dogs- That was  just crazy and don't tell me that was so predictable
Kill streak awards- Having a copter go around killing enemies for u was just insane

I can keep going on but i'll stop here cause i think i got my point across... sorry for writing so much guys.. all of this is giving me the erge to go play cod 4 again lol

 kmitchell63 wrote:

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

You're talking to the same people that frequently go over to the WaW forum and bash the game there... (some of these people even went over to the WaW forum talking about HALOPWNSU.... pretty pathetic)

---

visit NinjaModz.com 'n' www.youtube.com/user/NYyankees722vids

 kmitchell63 wrote:

imo cod 4 single player is is the same upper class for sp with bioshock, half life, zelda, halo CE, goldeneye, Metal Gear Solid, cod 2, super mario 64, gears of war etc etc... Man do u even remember All ghilled up, has to be one of my all time favorite levels. From the sneeking around in the high grass while enimies are right next to you, to the dogs , to the insanly long sniper shot, then the mad dash out, the copter crash, then having to carry the captian to the amusement park defending yourself against a never ending amount of enemies... man i have no clue how u can say that this is mediocre.

Ok, 2 levels, the only 2 good levels in the SP.  Everything else, the story, the actions, and the ending were so predictable and cliched.  Good guys go in to stop bad guys from destroying the world.  Bad guys launch nukes, good guys stop them at last second (in mid flight).  Final gun battle good guys almost die, and you are about to be executed when at the last possible second your allies save your life and you kill the bad guys.  Good guys win.  Heard it a million times, the story was not all that, thus predictable around every bend and cliched.

 kmitchell63 wrote:

As for what did cod 4 add that was new... well first it was the first call of duty to break away from the WW2 era and go modern. When they went to modern warfare they added new guns and technology that was never used before in a cod. Yes i know ur going to say that this is new to call of duty but not other games so im gunna add more.
Perks- I'm pretty sure cod 4 was the first to have this. stopping power, juggernaut etc, u could set ur classes to the style of game that u play

Not the first game to have perks, the first game to have customizable perks, possibly, but COD 3 implemented them first within the classes you choose.  Mines, extra grenades or smokes, airstrikes, rifle grenades, extra ammo, revive, etc.

 kmitchell63 wrote:

attachments- red dot, scopes, camo, 3x grenades again the same with perks u can pick which style of game u want to play

Does Rainbow Six Vegas come to mind?  First game (that I know of, could be more games out there before it) that had customizable attachments.  Reflex, ACOG, 6x 12x scopes, silencers, rifle scopes, hi cap mags laser sights.  So no, attachments arent anything new in the FPS world.

 kmitchell63 wrote:

Sabotage gametype- this was new to cod 4 and it has become a popular gametype

Ok, so it put in a new game mode, thats revolutionary?

 kmitchell63 wrote:

ranking up system/prestige- new idea...ur kills points add up over time and u rank up unlocking new weapons and perks. This created a long lasting game that wouldn't get old and stale.

been in games before COD 4.  In fact COD 3 had a ranking system, an in game ranking system that gave you extra utilities as you ranked up.  BF 2 also had a ranking system to it as well as Rainbow Six Vegas, from Private to Elite.  Again, nothing new to the genre.

 kmitchell63 wrote:

Challenges-  made gameplay more interesting made u use different guns

ok, so mini achievements inside the game

 kmitchell63 wrote:

Dogs- That was  just crazy and don't tell me that was so predictable
Kill streak awards- Having a copter go around killing enemies for u was just insane

Yes, computer generated kills are great, and skillful, not unbalanced or anything.  Besides the perks the kill streak rewards were the worst aspect of COD 4/WaW because they were so unbalanced.  Plus this kind of stuff was done before in other games...BF you could actually fly the chopper and get kills yourself rather than have a computer generated handicap do it for you

 kmitchell63 wrote:

I can keep going on but i'll stop here cause i think i got my point across... sorry for writing so much guys.. all of this is giving me the erge to go play cod 4 again lol

Everything, other than challenges and sabotage had been done before in other games prior to COD 4, and if you had been reading what I first said I had stated to name things that COD 4 did that have never been done before in the GENRE, as and FPS, not in the series.  But I should have expected that from a COD 4 fanboy who thinks it invented everything.  Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!

Support gunners did ruin the game imo. They drop too fast and can still pull off an accurate shot.

However once you know how many are on their team a good rifleman can take them out in one shot.

---

My Setup & Website.
Wii: 20819625 93312746, PSN: CASgamer398
Black Dingoo A320 owner.

 Hdaaap123 wrote:

 HALOPWNSU wrote:

Nah COD3 is about skillful rifle awesomeness and vehicles and classes and then maybe support.

Either way I think support sucks.... It takes forever to get into position, it reloads slow, it takes several bullets to kill, and its a pain in the quantum singularity.

The rifle on the other hand gets cluster kills with rifle grenades, is a quick weapon and usually only takes 1-2 shots, is quick and reloads fast, and is great range. COD3 is best to me because it brought skill to the table not duck and cover, spray for points.

COD3 will always be the best COD in my opinion and I don't care what IW fanboy says I'm wrong.
I might add that the most I've got with support at a time was maybe 3 kills, and when you do get good with support its just walk, prone, shoot, walk , prone, shoot, zzzzzzzzz.

Stick to support if you want every other weapon even the bazooka is better.

cod4 and 5 do take skill you cant just play it and be good

Umm... Yes you can. Just throw grenades everywhere and use martyrdom and you're a great CoD4/5 player.All the CoDs are so boring now I've moved on. 3 was actually pretty fun though.

 NYyankees722 wrote:

 kmitchell63 wrote:

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

You're talking to the same people that frequently go over to the WaW forum and bash the game there... (some of these people even went over to the WaW forum talking about HALOPWNSU.... pretty pathetic)

Wait people are talking about me and I'm unaware of it?

Links please...

---

I have been banned till 2161.
Mod abuse to the highest power. Just another example of digital fascism.

 Kramerllama wrote:

 Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

Ok buddy i'm a cod 4 fanboy? I haven't even gotten passed the 1st prestige in the game. I really don't find the mp that fun and to be honest i don't like the faster pace of the game so i don't play it. I'm just keeping it real, i know a good game when i see it and i don't bash it just because i don't particularily like it. In fact i have been playing cod 3 since release almost 2 1/2 years ago and i was a strong supporter of the game against the cod 2 haters. And I have over 100,000 points in ranked games all legit(you can look at my stats, i think im ranked somewhere around 100th)

I even forgot to mention the game engine that cod 4 is running on. Yes it is based off the quake engine but it was completly revamped for this game and it runs so good and has been used for 2 games already. What more do you want for the 7th sequal of a series. R u one of those people who wanted cod to go into future warfare and shoot lasers around?

As for single player i guess you are entitled to your own opinion, lets agree to disagree. I still find it hard to believe that u don't like it though. I think that you just didn't like the change from cod 3 and didn't like the mp so u decided to hate the whole game...What is everybody elses trhoughts on cod 4 sp?

Anyway Long live cod 3

 kmitchell63 wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

Ok buddy i'm a cod 4 fanboy? I haven't even gotten passed the 1st prestige in the game. I really don't find the mp that fun and to be honest i don't like the faster pace of the game so i don't play it. I'm just keeping it real, i know a good game when i see it and i don't bash it just because i don't particularily like it. In fact i have been playing cod 3 since release almost 2 1/2 years ago and i was a strong supporter of the game against the cod 2 haters. And I have over 100,000 points in ranked games all legit(you can look at my stats, i think im ranked somewhere around 100th)

From your posts it kinda sounded like you loved COD 4 and hated COD 3, my mistake.  Glad to hear you enjoy COD 3 though

I even forgot to mention the game engine that cod 4 is running on. Yes it is based off the quake engine but it was completly revamped for this game and it runs so good and has been used for 2 games already. What more do you want for the 7th sequal of a series. R u one of those people who wanted cod to go into future warfare and shoot lasers around?

No, I hate futuristic shooters like Halo and all them, dont appeal to me.  Even Frontlines I didnt like, it all depends on the setting and how they pull it off.  COD 4 didnt do that for me, the MP maps looked like I have seen them a million times in pictures and movies and there was no variety in the maps scenery (all bland deserted desert towns with not much going on).  Really to me each map looked the same with different buliding moved around here and there.  Vacant and The missile site were the only 2 unique ones that didnt follow that.

As for single player i guess you are entitled to your own opinion, lets agree to disagree. I still find it hard to believe that u don't like it though. I think that you just didn't like the change from cod 3 and didn't like the mp so u decided to hate the whole game...What is everybody elses trhoughts on cod 4 sp?

No, honestly the MP just pissed me off to no end, I found the perks to be unbalanced as well as the kill streak bonuses....why should the winning team be rewarded with bonuses that help *** the losing team?  3 helicopters in a row in one game (whether I was on the side with the choppers or not) isnt even fun.  But thats another discussion for another time.  The maps were also small for my tastes, didnt really like them.  And I gave my views on the SP.

Anyway Long live cod 3

really only a few modern warfare games have captured my attention and pulled me in and they were BFBC, OpFlash, and the Rainbow games  If its not those games, and is modern warfare I dont bother with it unless it can pull me in with something unique in terms of the setting, story, maps, or whatever

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!

 Kramerllama wrote:

 kmitchell63 wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

Ok buddy i'm a cod 4 fanboy? I haven't even gotten passed the 1st prestige in the game. I really don't find the mp that fun and to be honest i don't like the faster pace of the game so i don't play it. I'm just keeping it real, i know a good game when i see it and i don't bash it just because i don't particularily like it. In fact i have been playing cod 3 since release almost 2 1/2 years ago and i was a strong supporter of the game against the cod 2 haters. And I have over 100,000 points in ranked games all legit(you can look at my stats, i think im ranked somewhere around 100th)

From your posts it kinda sounded like you loved COD 4 and hated COD 3, my mistake.  Glad to hear you enjoy COD 3 though

I even forgot to mention the game engine that cod 4 is running on. Yes it is based off the quake engine but it was completly revamped for this game and it runs so good and has been used for 2 games already. What more do you want for the 7th sequal of a series. R u one of those people who wanted cod to go into future warfare and shoot lasers around?

No, I hate futuristic shooters like Halo and all them, dont appeal to me.  Even Frontlines I didnt like, it all depends on the setting and how they pull it off.  COD 4 didnt do that for me, the MP maps looked like I have seen them a million times in pictures and movies and there was no variety in the maps scenery (all bland deserted desert towns with not much going on).  Really to me each map looked the same with different buliding moved around here and there.  Vacant and The missile site were the only 2 unique ones that didnt follow that.

As for single player i guess you are entitled to your own opinion, lets agree to disagree. I still find it hard to believe that u don't like it though. I think that you just didn't like the change from cod 3 and didn't like the mp so u decided to hate the whole game...What is everybody elses trhoughts on cod 4 sp?

No, honestly the MP just pissed me off to no end, I found the perks to be unbalanced as well as the kill streak bonuses....why should the winning team be rewarded with bonuses that help *** the losing team?  3 helicopters in a row in one game (whether I was on the side with the choppers or not) isnt even fun.  But thats another discussion for another time.  The maps were also small for my tastes, didnt really like them.  And I gave my views on the SP.

Anyway Long live cod 3

really only a few modern warfare games have captured my attention and pulled me in and they were BFBC, OpFlash, and the Rainbow games  If its not those games, and is modern warfare I dont bother with it unless it can pull me in with something unique in terms of the setting, story, maps, or whatever

I guess COD4 Haters hate it because they suck at it, I mean come one every CoD4 hater says "the perks were  unbalanced", or "kill streak rewards were retarded", or "snipers are supposed to be 1-shot kill". I guess everybody has their opinions, but CoD4 haters suck at CoD4 and that's a fact. And they come up with stupid little reasons that'll make such an awesome game seem like garbage, so they can make themselves feel better, and make CoD3 an "awesome" game. Game reviews say everything and this is what it said CoD3= and CoD4=

 Rey owns wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 kmitchell63 wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

Ok buddy i'm a cod 4 fanboy? I haven't even gotten passed the 1st prestige in the game. I really don't find the mp that fun and to be honest i don't like the faster pace of the game so i don't play it. I'm just keeping it real, i know a good game when i see it and i don't bash it just because i don't particularily like it. In fact i have been playing cod 3 since release almost 2 1/2 years ago and i was a strong supporter of the game against the cod 2 haters. And I have over 100,000 points in ranked games all legit(you can look at my stats, i think im ranked somewhere around 100th)

From your posts it kinda sounded like you loved COD 4 and hated COD 3, my mistake.  Glad to hear you enjoy COD 3 though

I even forgot to mention the game engine that cod 4 is running on. Yes it is based off the quake engine but it was completly revamped for this game and it runs so good and has been used for 2 games already. What more do you want for the 7th sequal of a series. R u one of those people who wanted cod to go into future warfare and shoot lasers around?

No, I hate futuristic shooters like Halo and all them, dont appeal to me.  Even Frontlines I didnt like, it all depends on the setting and how they pull it off.  COD 4 didnt do that for me, the MP maps looked like I have seen them a million times in pictures and movies and there was no variety in the maps scenery (all bland deserted desert towns with not much going on).  Really to me each map looked the same with different buliding moved around here and there.  Vacant and The missile site were the only 2 unique ones that didnt follow that.

As for single player i guess you are entitled to your own opinion, lets agree to disagree. I still find it hard to believe that u don't like it though. I think that you just didn't like the change from cod 3 and didn't like the mp so u decided to hate the whole game...What is everybody elses trhoughts on cod 4 sp?

No, honestly the MP just pissed me off to no end, I found the perks to be unbalanced as well as the kill streak bonuses....why should the winning team be rewarded with bonuses that help *** the losing team?  3 helicopters in a row in one game (whether I was on the side with the choppers or not) isnt even fun.  But thats another discussion for another time.  The maps were also small for my tastes, didnt really like them.  And I gave my views on the SP.

Anyway Long live cod 3

really only a few modern warfare games have captured my attention and pulled me in and they were BFBC, OpFlash, and the Rainbow games  If its not those games, and is modern warfare I dont bother with it unless it can pull me in with something unique in terms of the setting, story, maps, or whatever

I guess COD4 Haters hate it because they suck at it, I mean come one every CoD4 hater says "the perks were  unbalanced", or "kill streak rewards were retarded", or "snipers are supposed to be 1-shot kill". I guess everybody has their opinions, but CoD4 haters suck at CoD4 and that's a fact. And they come up with stupid little reasons that'll make such an awesome game seem like garbage, so they can make themselves feel better, and make CoD3 an "awesome" game. Game reviews say everything and this is what it said CoD3= and CoD4=

Did you enjoy COD 4 more than Avatar, you managed to complete that?

---

I do many things. I span the genres - they call me the genre spanner.

 Rey owns wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 kmitchell63 wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

 Go back to your arcadey game with its unbalances and handicaps, and we'll stick to our game that takes skill and aiming to get a kill rather than spray and pray with an M4 or G36

Ok buddy i'm a cod 4 fanboy? I haven't even gotten passed the 1st prestige in the game. I really don't find the mp that fun and to be honest i don't like the faster pace of the game so i don't play it. I'm just keeping it real, i know a good game when i see it and i don't bash it just because i don't particularily like it. In fact i have been playing cod 3 since release almost 2 1/2 years ago and i was a strong supporter of the game against the cod 2 haters. And I have over 100,000 points in ranked games all legit(you can look at my stats, i think im ranked somewhere around 100th)

From your posts it kinda sounded like you loved COD 4 and hated COD 3, my mistake.  Glad to hear you enjoy COD 3 though

I even forgot to mention the game engine that cod 4 is running on. Yes it is based off the quake engine but it was completly revamped for this game and it runs so good and has been used for 2 games already. What more do you want for the 7th sequal of a series. R u one of those people who wanted cod to go into future warfare and shoot lasers around?

No, I hate futuristic shooters like Halo and all them, dont appeal to me.  Even Frontlines I didnt like, it all depends on the setting and how they pull it off.  COD 4 didnt do that for me, the MP maps looked like I have seen them a million times in pictures and movies and there was no variety in the maps scenery (all bland deserted desert towns with not much going on).  Really to me each map looked the same with different buliding moved around here and there.  Vacant and The missile site were the only 2 unique ones that didnt follow that.

As for single player i guess you are entitled to your own opinion, lets agree to disagree. I still find it hard to believe that u don't like it though. I think that you just didn't like the change from cod 3 and didn't like the mp so u decided to hate the whole game...What is everybody elses trhoughts on cod 4 sp?

No, honestly the MP just pissed me off to no end, I found the perks to be unbalanced as well as the kill streak bonuses....why should the winning team be rewarded with bonuses that help *** the losing team?  3 helicopters in a row in one game (whether I was on the side with the choppers or not) isnt even fun.  But thats another discussion for another time.  The maps were also small for my tastes, didnt really like them.  And I gave my views on the SP.

Anyway Long live cod 3

really only a few modern warfare games have captured my attention and pulled me in and they were BFBC, OpFlash, and the Rainbow games  If its not those games, and is modern warfare I dont bother with it unless it can pull me in with something unique in terms of the setting, story, maps, or whatever

I guess COD4 Haters hate it because they suck at it, I mean come one every CoD4 hater says "the perks were  unbalanced", or "kill streak rewards were retarded", or "snipers are supposed to be 1-shot kill". I guess everybody has their opinions, but CoD4 haters suck at CoD4 and that's a fact. And they come up with stupid little reasons that'll make such an awesome game seem like garbage, so they can make themselves feel better, and make CoD3 an "awesome" game. Game reviews say everything and this is what it said CoD3= and CoD4=

Ummm...

I don't base my opinion on COD4 being harder....
I base my opinion on the fact that COD4 is THE SAME *** OVER AND OVER AND OVER!

By the way Rey your blatant favoriteism is getting on my nerves.
You sound so smug about your opinion, you probably love the smell of your own farts.

---

I have been banned till 2161.
Mod abuse to the highest power. Just another example of digital fascism.

 kmitchell63 wrote:

idk why it is right for u guys to bash cod 4 and WAW all u like, but when some other person tries to bash cod 3 u get all upset.
Also how can you say that cod 4 was an mediocre game generic game that added nothing new. Cod 4 is probably the most smooth gameplay u will see in a game (besides halo) and has all the customization u want. And it had one of the all time great single players. Theres no wonder why it won so many awards and was the most played game on xbox for over a year

this DOES happen to be the Call of Duty 3 forums, so thats why. Also, the customization in Call of Duty is limited to weapons and perks only, not armor, like Halo. The only way i could differentiate between different gamertags was the gamertag over their heads.

---

Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici

I agree with kmitchell. CoD4 SP was one of the best campaigns I ever played. MP was meh as all hell...... same thing over and over and over. Give me TF2, DoD:S, CoD3, L4D MP anyday.... you know, MP games that keep switching it up and keep it fresh. That scene as the soldier crawling around the copter after the nuke....... wow. Powerful. Awesome. I'd love to play another SP game like CoD4. But MP? Please. I've had more fun tweezing out my nut hairs.

I wasn't the greatest CoD4 MP player(I beat the campaign on Veteran and did mile high club in Vet too), but I did have my games where I'd run around slaughtering other players and deploying chopper strikes and such.. I found those ones just as dull. Levelling up did nothing for me.

A good MP game for me is one I can play for hours........ I'm not a hardcore gamer anymore and I have to stop playing after an hour, usually, because I get restless. This is true for 99% of games out there. Only the truly exceptional ones can do differently. CoD4 failed in this regard, CoD3 does not, thereby, to me, CoD3 multiplayer > CoD4 MP

 Moe45673 wrote:

I agree with kmitchell. CoD4 SP was one of the best campaigns I ever played. MP was meh as all hell...... same thing over and over and over. Give me TF2, DoD:S, CoD3, L4D MP anyday.... you know, MP games that keep switching it up and keep it fresh. That scene as the soldier crawling around the copter after the nuke....... wow. Powerful. Awesome. I'd love to play another SP game like CoD4. But MP? Please. I've had more fun tweezing out my nut hairs.

To each his own I guess, but the COD 4 campaign didnt impress me much.  There were only 2 enjoyable levels in the whole SP and that was all ghilled up, everything else was meh.  I found the story to be rather cliche and old.  I found The Darkness, Bioshock, BiA HH, and FC 2 to have way better stories than COD 4.  But hey, to each his own

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!

 Kramerllama wrote:

To each his own I guess, but the COD 4 campaign didnt impress me much.  There were only 2 enjoyable levels in the whole SP and that was all ghilled up, everything else was meh.  I found the story to be rather cliche and old.  I found The Darkness, Bioshock, BiA HH, and FC 2 to have way better stories than COD 4.  But hey, to each his own

I agree with that. All Ghillied Up was unique and will be remebered for a long time I think. Other than that the game was just a usual shooter with a lot of hollywood elements.

I guess that's what you're going to get now anyway after the amount of CoDs that's been out.

CoD is more about the Multiplayer these days. I wouldn't buy one for the single player, and as it stands now I wouldn't buy another one for the multiplayer either.

---

My Setup & Website.
Wii: 20819625 93312746, PSN: CASgamer398
Black Dingoo A320 owner.

 Kramerllama wrote:

To each his own I guess, but the COD 4 campaign didnt impress me much.  There were only 2 enjoyable levels in the whole SP and that was all ghilled up, everything else was meh.  I found the story to be rather cliche and old.  I found The Darkness, Bioshock, BiA HH, and FC 2 to have way better stories than COD 4.  But hey, to each his own

I don't fully disagree. I loved the Darkness story though the ending I found to be anti-climactic. The journey was pretty awesome and engrossing.

Bioshock didn't do it that much for me, for some reason. I think it had something to do with the fact that you could never die...... it was like godmode was always on. I didn't play the final 2 games, though BiA: HH is on my "intrigued by" list

 Moe45673 wrote:

 Kramerllama wrote:

To each his own I guess, but the COD 4 campaign didnt impress me much.  There were only 2 enjoyable levels in the whole SP and that was all ghilled up, everything else was meh.  I found the story to be rather cliche and old.  I found The Darkness, Bioshock, BiA HH, and FC 2 to have way better stories than COD 4.  But hey, to each his own

I don't fully disagree. I loved the Darkness story though the ending I found to be anti-climactic. The journey was pretty awesome and engrossing.

Bioshock didn't do it that much for me, for some reason. I think it had something to do with the fact that you could never die...... it was like godmode was always on. I didn't play the final 2 games, though BiA: HH is on my "intrigued by" list

ts a great game with an engaging story.  Basically if you like Rainbow ix Vegas and WWII this is a good game to play then

http://www.trueachievements.com/gamereviews.aspx?gameid=1762#c18369 a review I made for the game

---

COD...the poor mans BF
11/17 = greatest day ever!