Faded XIII wrote:
Are you really saying use google instead of real education? If someone is driven to use google for information then why educate them at all?
Absolutely not. I am saying that learning how to find accurate information on your own should be made into a class. This is a complex subject worthy of a class. Every human has biases. Every orgnaization has biases. Every human in those orgnizations has biases. So all information put out by anyone is likely to have biases and inconsistencies. One small part of the class would be identifying biases. Another small section would be learning about fallacies, what they are, what they mean, why they are important. Another part would be learning about finding out information from a public library. Other real world sources as well. This stuff is already taught in schools, but needs to be taught far more throughly.
I could go in to more detail, but you get the basic idea hopefully.
The second part of what I am suggesting is that some information we teach to HIGH SCHOOL and MIDDLE SCHOOL and ELEMENTARY SCHOOL students is unnecessary. They may not be ever going into that field of study, so that information should not be tested on. What is the date of Abraham Lincoln's birth? I dont know. But give me 30 seconds and I can tell you. That sort of information can be mentioned in class, and should be mentioned. However, I dont believe those sorts of dates need to be on tests at a middle and high school level.
Faded XIII wrote:
As for your analogy, dates are extremely important. So just knowing about when it happened doesnt cut it. Your setting yourself up for failure if you plan on living in educated society instead of flipping burgers.
Dates are not extremely important with my analogy. And no need to insult me (even if its vieled as a warning).
Faded XIII wrote:
Without dates in 100 years were going to have a million kids walking around thinking dinosaurs walked the earth when lincoln was president. Perhaps not paying attention and getting Fs WAS your downfall, your just filling in spaces that you created with some messed up educational theory you fantasized about while playing chess, you relate your life to that and come to the conclusion learning principles is more important than facts.
Incorrect. I suggested that precise dates be mentioned in class but not be tested on. The children should be tested an approximate dates, and sequences of events in history. This is a generalization. Certain dates should be known precisely, dates that affect us often, and knowing the precise date is useful. Take for example, holidays. But even so, memorizing that information becomes less and less important as computing technology expands. I rarely played chess in highschool. Again with the insulting?
I dont believe I ever said learning principles is more important that learning facts. Some facts are more important to learn than some principles. You can not say one group is more important that the other, it comes down to each individual one. I will say that I believe that often there is too strong of an emphasis on unimportant facts and busy work in high/middle/elementary schools, and less of an emphasis on things such as principles, varying moral standpoints and
Faded XIII wrote:
Heres another one for you. Do you want to goto a Doctor for an operation or a Plumber? Because one will generally use more facts than the other to get the job done. The principle behind fixing internal bleeding is not much different than fixing a leaky faucet.. So again, who is your surgeon?
Unnaplicaple to my idea. I am referring to highschool students and below. I would want the surgeon that had specified schooling where he or she learned about surgery, and even took part in surgeries. I would want a plumber that had specialized schooling as well, and/or alternatively much on hand experience. But I dont think plumbing or how to perform surgeries should be taught in highschool.
Faded XIII wrote:
Still not convinced? The principle behind throwing a punch is no different from your average person and the worlds best boxer. So what makes the difference here? A boxer relies on tried and true FACTS, your average person just knows I CLUB WITH HAND ... MEE HURT YOU!
I dont think serious boxing should be taught in a highschool setting. But yes, to be a great boxer you are going to need a lot of training beyond what you get in highschool.
Faded XIII wrote:
Try having a conversation without relying on google. Sounds like you spend so much time talking on a computer where you can type in google.com that youve created a crutch. A crutch that wont hold you up in reality. Maybe when you have 2 weeks for a 9th grade report, but not when your trying to converse with an educated adult. Sort of like those people who cant play scrabble without a dictionary.
When I have a conversation in a real world setting I am glad I know about concepts and principles more than specific names and dates. I would feel like a pompous *** spouting out some trivia fact such as "The Buddha was born in 605 BC" when instead I can discuss the much more important aspects of the Buddha's life, such as his contributions to philosophy and spirituality.
It appears your previous quote that when you read through my posts you feel I'm am somewhat illiterate and/or incapable of holding a intelligent conversation without my google crutch. As far as I can remember I havent once used google for anything I have written in this thread. So tell me, do you feel that I am capable of holding my own in a intelligent conversation with someone who can play scrabble without a dictionary?
Also, as technology increases it will be easier and easier to to access information through online sources. Already it can be accessed on a cellphone. Give it fifteen years.