Thornass wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

Personally I'd rather see a sci-fi type, or some market place content further fleshing out the current midway.

Modern warfare engagements with all the smart weaponry and extreme range engagements just kills it for me.

I agree.  Id like something similar to the opening scenes of Star Wars Episode 3

That would be a must buy for me.

"Battlestations: Starwars"  

Not even necessarily Star Wars.  I just want huge capital ships broadsiding eachother with powerful blaster cannons.  Little fighters/bombers/corvettes zipping in and out trying to oust eachother and destroy the capital ships.

There was a game like that for the PC Star Wars Rebellion. It was a strategic game that let you command your fleets during battle. I dont think it did too well, but with modern graphics and playstyle could be cool.

I have Star Wars Epire at War.  An RTS... but Id rather a Battlestations type game

---

Want:
Mass Effect 2
SWTOR
Dragon Age Origins
Forza3
OpFlash 2
Assassin's Creed 2
RUSE
Borderlands
Saboteur
IL2
RFG

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

Personally I'd rather see a sci-fi type, or some market place content further fleshing out the current midway.

Modern warfare engagements with all the smart weaponry and extreme range engagements just kills it for me.

I agree.  Id like something similar to the opening scenes of Star Wars Episode 3

That would be a must buy for me.

"Battlestations: Starwars"  

Not even necessarily Star Wars.  I just want huge capital ships broadsiding eachother with powerful blaster cannons.  Little fighters/bombers/corvettes zipping in and out trying to oust eachother and destroy the capital ships.

I understand, and I'd buy it.  :)

I really, really, like the gameplay of midway, and  I'd really, really like to see more games with this type of gameplay.

The big war feeling you get, limited units with no respawning, tactical/strategic gameplay, with small numbers of actual players making it a more friendly game.   All combined make this something else.

I'd love to see a new shooter type evolve from this also, no respawning.   4 on 4 with each side having squads of infantry/space marines/ or whatever.     Similiar in gameplay, however faster paced large battles, but with limited players.

Over the last few years I've been really big on playing games with large amounts of players, due to the excitement a big battle has.   Aircraft over head fighting it out, tanks standing off, all the while a small squad on squad infantry battle goes on.    It definitely is super immersive when all this is happening, and times you just have to step back and observe/admire what is going on. 

I at first did not like limited amounts of players in games, but since playing gears I've changed my mind because of how much talking goes on in these types of games.    It is definitely a more social game when it has a smaller player count where people talk more.

Midways game type is the Best of both worlds though, and something I'd really like to see more of.  The huge battles that a big online game has, and the social aspect of a smaller game.     Which also has the added advantage of these big battles being better coordinated.

We really get to have our cake and eat it too on this one.

Given that, maybe a Battlestations:2010 FRONT LINE kinda thing would be cool.     More small engagement stuff with Infantry and vehicles.

---

"Conquer or Die!"

 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:

That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

Take it from someone who is IN the USN: no, they could not.

 PrimoLoz wrote:

I see people talking about who has the best Navy. I went to a Navy day at a dockyard where i live and i have to say, The German and Netherland Navy had ships wich were more advanced than what the US Navy brought. The British were on par with USA. But ive got to admit that USA has bigger Aircraft carriers and planes (i think).

Also, i bet quite a few Americans didnt know their Navy was invented by somone from Scotland.

Firstly, who do you think the European powers (if that is the word) get their tech from? Primarily american contractors. It's part of the whole 'being allies' thing. The USN has the most flexible and advanced tech afloat today.

I'm an avionics technician for an F/A-18C squadron. (soon to be E model)

 b negative wrote:

the finnish navy has stealth ships now which are awesome!!

Google "Sea Shadow"

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  Canada S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

 

The only way the USN would be beaten is through our spineless politicians...

 NevadaJack wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  Canada S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

 

The only way the USN would be beaten is through our spineless politicians...

Oh how quicly we forget. During the Falklands War the British (who at the time had one of the most modern navies of any country) lost a destroyer the HMS Sheffield when it was hit by Exocet missles fired by the Argentines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War#Sinking_of_HMS_Sheffield . Proof that even in the most lopsided of situations modern weaponry can do amazing things. Those were missles created for 30 years ago. Most modern navies carry similar and better weapons now. The point here is that it is the "use" of a navy not its strength that makes it great. The mightiest of navies can be sunk to the bottom if its mishandled. Modern navies are all about power projection. The days of grand fleets dueling each other are long over.

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 Punisher9021 wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  The Canadian S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

first off, learn how to post once... and snowmobiles? come on, try harder than that.

Well excuse me, but there kept being a error message saying the post wouln't go through, and when it finally did there were multiple post so get over it. And I don't care if you don't take Canada's artic warfare ability seriously, you will when they invade Alaska.

Oh yeah, you swearing and threatening to hunt people down was real creative, I commend you on your ability to instill fear in the fearless.

 

lol i dont really care, you can have Alaska, its just an oversized icecube anyway

---

Never ask where a man is from. If He's from Texas... He'll tell you, If he's not... you wouldn't want to embarass him.

 b negative wrote:

the only thing the american  fleets have going for them is the carriers and aegis ships. however,the british have the best submarine force,including training! 6 years ago,during a joint exercise,the brits did a destoyer up with lights and a bengali speaker on the radio,they got within 2 miles of a  carrier and 'sunk' it........they made out they were a indian tour ship!!! its not how good or how many ships a navy has,its about the intelligence of the captains who control them.

O.K. this is stupid, they woulda been able to visually confirm that it wasn't a cruise ship at over 20 miles, this is not even counting the distance that the rest of the battlegroup would be able to spot it at.

 Punisher9021 wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 Punisher9021 wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  The Canadian S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

first off, learn how to post once... and snowmobiles? come on, try harder than that.

Well excuse me, but there kept being a error message saying the post wouln't go through, and when it finally did there were multiple post so get over it. And I don't care if you don't take Canada's artic warfare ability seriously, you will when they invade Alaska.

Oh yeah, you swearing and threatening to hunt people down was real creative, I commend you on your ability to instill fear in the fearless.

 

lol i dont really care, you can have Alaska, its just an oversized icecube anyway

Obviously I grossly overestimated your intelligence if you are unable to grasp simple sarcasm.

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

 

Lol I thought the foil was so the government couldnt read your mind! Also when the topic "Name the worlds best Navys" comes up, Sweeden isnt on the list buddy.  Japan is heavily restricted on what military the are "allowed" to have due to the agreement/treaty at the end of WW2. Facts, read'em and weep.

 b negative wrote:

the only thing the american  fleets have going for them is the carriers and aegis ships. however,the british have the best submarine force,including training! 6 years ago,during a joint exercise,the brits did a destoyer up with lights and a bengali speaker on the radio,they got within 2 miles of a  carrier and 'sunk' it........they made out they were a indian tour ship!!! its not how good or how many ships a navy has,its about the intelligence of the captains who control them.

No US Ballistic Missile Submarine  has been detected, nor do the hardly ever do "war games" becuase they are usaly sitting some were running there owne drills waiting for the call they hope never comes. And the Seawolf-class submarines were designed to operate autonomously against the world's most capable submarine and surface threats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They should incompus all of WWII into Battle Stations. That way we could fight with every ship and plane from WWII, and make up some cool battles like Bismark vs the New York, or having Japan bombing Germany or European targets.

---

Enzo owners fear one car on the track....Saleen S7. 437/315th AW

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

Personally I'd rather see a sci-fi type, or some market place content further fleshing out the current midway.

Modern warfare engagements with all the smart weaponry and extreme range engagements just kills it for me.

I agree.  Id like something similar to the opening scenes of Star Wars Episode 3

That would be a must buy for me.

"Battlestations: Starwars"  

Not even necessarily Star Wars.  I just want huge capital ships broadsiding eachother with powerful blaster cannons.  Little fighters/bombers/corvettes zipping in and out trying to oust eachother and destroy the capital ships.

/sarcastic Wow that does sound like a very good game. And I got the perfect name for it how 'bout Star Wars Battlefront II

---

"The only people that call others 'fanboys' are, themselves, fanboys of the competition."-JTerrell

 JTerrell wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

Personally I'd rather see a sci-fi type, or some market place content further fleshing out the current midway.

Modern warfare engagements with all the smart weaponry and extreme range engagements just kills it for me.

I agree.  Id like something similar to the opening scenes of Star Wars Episode 3

That would be a must buy for me.

"Battlestations: Starwars"  

Not even necessarily Star Wars.  I just want huge capital ships broadsiding eachother with powerful blaster cannons.  Little fighters/bombers/corvettes zipping in and out trying to oust eachother and destroy the capital ships.

/sarcastic Wow that does sound like a very good game. And I got the perfect name for it how 'bout Star Wars Battlefront II

Be careful with that "Sarcasm" weapon, it's not a toy to be played with willy nilly.   Might I suggest a sarcasm saftey course that specializes in "knowing what your talking about" ?

---

"Conquer or Die!"

 Thornass wrote:

 NevadaJack wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  Canada S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

 

The only way the USN would be beaten is through our spineless politicians...

Oh how quicly we forget. During the Falklands War the British (who at the time had one of the most modern navies of any country) lost a destroyer the HMS Sheffield when it was hit by Exocet missles fired by the Argentines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War#Sinking_of_HMS_Sheffield . Proof that even in the most lopsided of situations modern weaponry can do amazing things. Those were missles created for 30 years ago. Most modern navies carry similar and better weapons now. The point here is that it is the "use" of a navy not its strength that makes it great. The mightiest of navies can be sunk to the bottom if its mishandled. Modern navies are all about power projection. The days of grand fleets dueling each other are long over.

Oh my yes, the Brits just tucked tail and ran home once one of their ships got blasted.

:rolleyes:

Yup, folks on boths side die most of the time and...

...sometimes the little guy will get in a good lick but, that isn't what wins the war.

How about a ye olde Battlestations? CANNONS.

First of all, way to go making a perfectly fine thread about "who'd beat who if we ever went to war".

I'd like another Battlestations tho, maybe in europe. Especially if they included the Tirpitz which got sunk not all too far from where I live, not to mention the large number of naval and air confrontations that took place all over europe. Though, I hope they use some of the unused potential I see in Battestations.

If they make it a futuristic game I hope it's not going to be a "lockon, click button" game, but instead have countersystems developed that more or less killed off smart weapons, leaving us back to square one, cept with bigger, badder guns.

 JTerrell wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

 BnT MeowChef wrote:

 Steel42 wrote:

Personally I'd rather see a sci-fi type, or some market place content further fleshing out the current midway.

Modern warfare engagements with all the smart weaponry and extreme range engagements just kills it for me.

I agree.  Id like something similar to the opening scenes of Star Wars Episode 3

That would be a must buy for me.

"Battlestations: Starwars"  

Not even necessarily Star Wars.  I just want huge capital ships broadsiding eachother with powerful blaster cannons.  Little fighters/bombers/corvettes zipping in and out trying to oust eachother and destroy the capital ships.

/sarcastic Wow that does sound like a very good game. And I got the perfect name for it how 'bout Star Wars Battlefront II

The capital ships arent controllable... and the space battles in that game suck nuts. 

---

Want:
Mass Effect 2
SWTOR
Dragon Age Origins
Forza3
OpFlash 2
Assassin's Creed 2
RUSE
Borderlands
Saboteur
IL2
RFG

 OG Wretch wrote:

 Thornass wrote:

 NevadaJack wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  Canada S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

 

The only way the USN would be beaten is through our spineless politicians...

Oh how quicly we forget. During the Falklands War the British (who at the time had one of the most modern navies of any country) lost a destroyer the HMS Sheffield when it was hit by Exocet missles fired by the Argentines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War#Sinking_of_HMS_Sheffield . Proof that even in the most lopsided of situations modern weaponry can do amazing things. Those were missles created for 30 years ago. Most modern navies carry similar and better weapons now. The point here is that it is the "use" of a navy not its strength that makes it great. The mightiest of navies can be sunk to the bottom if its mishandled. Modern navies are all about power projection. The days of grand fleets dueling each other are long over.

Oh my yes, the Brits just tucked tail and ran home once one of their ships got blasted.

:rolleyes:

Yup, folks on boths side die most of the time and...

...sometimes the little guy will get in a good lick but, that isn't what wins the war.

I think you missed the point there. The Idea of one navy going after another in the same way as they did 60 years ago died a long time ago. I was hardly implying the Brits packed it in. Actually it was a valuable lesson in modern naval tactics. The real point is fleet commanders will rarely close in any closer than the range of thier aircraft and missles because it is too risky to try direct surface engagements these days. The last two sentences of my post sum it up.

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

 Thornass wrote:

 OG Wretch wrote:

 Thornass wrote:

 NevadaJack wrote:

 RagaMuffin wrote:

 RogueWarrior72 wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

You mean all combined?  If not - you will find playing with any of the wireless accessories far better by taking off all the tin foil wrapped around your head acting as an antenna for UFO signals.

Even combined they wouldn't do much more than scratch our Navy.  Perhaps if all our ships were in drydock, and all our aircraft's engines were being overhauled, perhaps then they might stand a chance.  Doubtful, but there is a possibility.  Canada S.D.F. ( Snowmobile Defense Force) on the otherhand has top notch snowmobile technology, the United States of America's snowmobiles wouldn't stand a chance.

 

The only way the USN would be beaten is through our spineless politicians...

Oh how quicly we forget. During the Falklands War the British (who at the time had one of the most modern navies of any country) lost a destroyer the HMS Sheffield when it was hit by Exocet missles fired by the Argentines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falklands_War#Sinking_of_HMS_Sheffield . Proof that even in the most lopsided of situations modern weaponry can do amazing things. Those were missles created for 30 years ago. Most modern navies carry similar and better weapons now. The point here is that it is the "use" of a navy not its strength that makes it great. The mightiest of navies can be sunk to the bottom if its mishandled. Modern navies are all about power projection. The days of grand fleets dueling each other are long over.

Oh my yes, the Brits just tucked tail and ran home once one of their ships got blasted.

:rolleyes:

Yup, folks on boths side die most of the time and...

...sometimes the little guy will get in a good lick but, that isn't what wins the war.

I think you missed the point there. The Idea of one navy going after another in the same way as they did 60 years ago died a long time ago. I was hardly implying the Brits packed it in. Actually it was a valuable lesson in modern naval tactics. The real point is fleet commanders will rarely close in any closer than the range of thier aircraft and missles because it is too risky to try direct surface engagements these days. The last two sentences of my post sum it up.

The idea I got from the debate was current fleets doing battle in the modern age with new tech and strategies.

The Argentines did launch the missle from an aircraft to get the hit on the Sheffield.

Not matter the Era, when folks do war people on both sides will die and that was my point.

In any war, the one with the best/most resourses and resolve wins every time.

I didn't get what point you were trying to make with bringing up the Sheffield incident.

 Losing the Sheffield was not that big a deal (other than to the Sailors and families involved)

in the grand scheme of that war.

It was modern naval combat IMHO.

True the surface engagments eneded long ago...

...like during WWII after the carriers with thier planes proved to work much better than Battlewagons pounding each other.

So what Navy could stand Against the US and win a war?

I doubt at this point and time that any could.

Russia stood a good chance back when but not now...

...that would have gone nuke anyway so everyone would have lost.

 

I didn't quote you OG cause the snips were getting long, but I think we are argueing the same point just in a different way. The short answer for me is I don't think a modern naval game would be as good for all the points you just made. Good points by the way.

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

The british navy used to be the best in the world!!!!!

 KYARR wrote:

The british navy used to be the best in the world!!!!!

Very true, From the time of the Spansih Armada's defeat until the 20th century The British navy was the dominate naval force in the world. The French gave them a hard time during the Napoleonic Age, but the British were such incredible seaman that they could snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. Now that would be cool too I think. An age of sail game that does it right. So far I've been pretty disappointed with games in that genre.

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:

That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

That is hilariously ignorant! I love it!

 MrSplendido wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:

That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

That is hilariously ignorant! I love it!

Anybody with Always Be Closing on thier gamercard can't be all bad, that takes Brass B--ls

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

 Thornass wrote:

 MrSplendido wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:

That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

That is hilariously ignorant! I love it!

Anybody with Always Be Closing on thier gamercard can't be all bad, that takes Brass B--ls

Strangely enough, I listen to that speech every monday at 9am while I have my coffee at work.

And yes I know, it's weird...but I can't complain about the money.

In your 1st post Kold DK you stated you would like ICBMs.  Now since there is nothing that anyone but the US has that can stop ICBMs then the US would just launch a ICBM at every enemy key target.  Has an ICBM ever been used in a war? NO!  Were talking about a game, there would be no side affects to using all your ICBMs, this isnt the real world where ICBMs would destroy the environment.  Not to mention that the US boomer submarines are UNDETECTABLE!  So you could give the US 1 missile silo and 1 sub and they could destroy the entire enemy force. 

And whoever made the remark about the Japanese navy being powerful, your about 60 years behind the times...  If all these navies are soooo powerful then why is it that the US is still the only super power?

---

OU SUCKS!

 Gosnork wrote:

In your 1st post Kold DK you stated you would like ICBMs.  Now since there is nothing that anyone but the US has that can stop ICBMs then the US would just launch a ICBM at every enemy key target.  Has an ICBM ever been used in a war? NO!  Were talking about a game, there would be no side affects to using all your ICBMs, this isnt the real world where ICBMs would destroy the environment.  Not to mention that the US boomer submarines are UNDETECTABLE!  So you could give the US 1 missile silo and 1 sub and they could destroy the entire enemy force. 

And whoever made the remark about the Japanese navy being powerful, your about 60 years behind the times...  If all these navies are soooo powerful then why is it that the US is still the only super power?

One word: Economics

---

Respect is a two way street, so respect each other or hit the street

That was hilarious. Roasted like a marshmallow microwave.

---

If you don't agree with me, then you're wrong.

US NAVY #1