bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

 bilbyc0m wrote:

 NERevolution23 wrote:

The fact that anyone considers this a good sonic game shows just how far sonic has fallen, since this game is terrible.

Just because the game has sonic in it does not  mean it is a sonic game u dumbas*.

Lol thats great. Two posts pointing out how wrong you are, and you have nothing to answer with, so you scroll up and try to find something ive said wrong.

I wasn't the person considering it a sonic game. It's a shitty mini game collection with shallow tennis gameplay mechanics, featuring sega characters. It was the 2nd and moreso the 4th post that I was referencing. Looking back on that post, I suppose I should have said, "The fact that anyone WOULD CONSIDER this a good sonic game.." to avoid any confusion for the "special" members of this forum like yourself. 
Though, its not like sonic games these days are good anyway.

---

 AKSIENER wrote:

was the hampster cool at least?

 Thumbs 0f Fury wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

Yes you are correct but I see no point in people posting threads about how bad games are. I don't go into the cod 5 forums posting sh*t like this.

 bilbyc0m wrote:

 Thumbs 0f Fury wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

Yes you are correct but I see no point in people posting threads about how bad games are. I don't go into the cod 5 forums posting sh*t like this.

There's a difference between calling a game bad because you don't like it, and calling a game bad because its a bad game.

Plus you don't own cod5, so nobody would take you seriously anyway.

---

 AKSIENER wrote:

was the hampster cool at least?

 NERevolution23 wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

 Thumbs 0f Fury wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

Yes you are correct but I see no point in people posting threads about how bad games are. I don't go into the cod 5 forums posting sh*t like this.

There's a difference between calling a game bad because you don't like it, and calling a game bad because its a bad game.

Plus you don't own cod5, so nobody would take you seriously anyway.

The reason i dont hav cod 5 is because i played it online at a friends place and the lag was horendous.

 bilbyc0m wrote:

 NERevolution23 wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

 Thumbs 0f Fury wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

Yes you are correct but I see no point in people posting threads about how bad games are. I don't go into the cod 5 forums posting sh*t like this.

There's a difference between calling a game bad because you don't like it, and calling a game bad because its a bad game.

Plus you don't own cod5, so nobody would take you seriously anyway.

The reason i dont hav cod 5 is because i played it online at a friends place and the lag was horendous.

Maybe your friend should get a better internet connection? The lag can be bad in any game. Doesn't mean that it always is.

---

 AKSIENER wrote:

was the hampster cool at least?

i wouldnt go outta my way to buy this game but it wasnt bad for free. i'm still playin' the mini games,kinda fun when your 3 sheets to the wind,hahahaha.

---

لجنة هي ويسكي ولحم الخنزير المقدد
Paradise is whiskey and bacon

NERevolution23 is dumb.

finally sum1 agrees with me.

 akashsawan5 wrote:

NERevolution23 uses logic and sense in his arguments. 

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

Shall I continue to argue the point out with u or should u just shut the f*ck up like a ***

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I have this game and i think it is so fun. definetly worth it. brings bak memories of alex kidd, jet set radio and of course chu chu rocket. sega fan or not. this is one of the best games on the market.

Let's get real here man. If you like SEGA, and you like Sonic.. it's still not worth 60 bucks. If this was a 10 dollar game sure.

Halo 3 is better
Cod 4 is better
Gears 1 and 2 are better.

It might be one of the worse games out if we're comparing.

It has mediocore graphics.
Sub par depth.
CHeesey not fun mini games.

Brutal controlls. It's just not a good game.

It's fun for a little bit, but if you pay 60$'s you're getting a bad deal.

---

izHere
Sponsored - E2K gaming

I paid $120  the day it came out and every cent was worth it. It has been one of my most tresured 360 games ever. Me being a huge sega fan, I really get alot of enjoyment out of this game. All the characters are familiar and remind u of some of segas greatest mascots. me, also being a tennis player, enjoy this type of gameplay. As I said b4. Why do people like revolution have to flame a game like this. Why waste their time seriously. He thinks its a bad game, he doesent need to let the whole world know. He should keep it to himself and let other people decide for themselves on wether this is a good game or not.

 bilbyc0m wrote:

Shall I continue to argue the point out with u or should u just shut the f*ck up like a ***

Please; continue. I find it amusing how you argue all guns blazing about Sega Superstars Tennis of all games.

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I paid $120  the day it came out and every cent was worth it. It has been one of my most tresured 360 games ever. Me being a huge sega fan, I really get alot of enjoyment out of this game. All the characters are familiar and remind u of some of segas greatest mascots. me, also being a tennis player, enjoy this type of gameplay. As I said b4. Why do people like revolution have to flame a game like this. Why waste their time seriously. He thinks its a bad game, he doesent need to let the whole world know. He should keep it to himself and let other people decide for themselves on wether this is a good game or not.

Okay.

You like SEGA.
You like Tennis.

Even if you're a hardcore sega and tennis player, this game still isn't good.

I mean I like playing LOTR BFME II. You would say the game has terrible controlls. and is a bad RTS game.

but I still enjoy it, but that doesn't make it a good game.

Sega tennis isn't a good game compared to what's offered, but if you like sega a lot and tennis you will find some enjoyment out of it

---

izHere
Sponsored - E2K gaming

Its not a fact if u think a game is bad or good. It can only be an oppinion. LOTR BFME 2 is a fantastic game and im sure many other xbox live players would enjoy it just as much as I do. Same goes for sega tennis. Just because u dislike doesent mean its a bad game. You just will think that way because u dont like it urself. I can say for sure that there are no factual bad games. Because a bad game means 100% of the players have to hate the game. By him saying this is the worst game ever made, he must not have played very many games.

-superman 64
-E.T
-Custers revenge
-Shaq Fu
-Bomberman act zero

These are examples of games that most  people will dislike. Some people actually enjoy these games and might think it is a great game. although this is rare, im sure there are people out there who like these games. So unless u are god, u cant decide on which games go in the bad section and which games go in the good section. Let people decide for themselves wether this is a good game or not in their oppinion.

So E.T. on the Atari. Often quoted as the worst game of all time for absolutely shocking design, glitches galore, horrid graphics and terrible gameplay. Many purchased games were sent back to the publisher. Is that simply just opinion or is it possible that some games are just plain bad?

And by the way, you undermine your statement when you say "a bad game means 100% of the players have to hate the game". If 1% of players enjoy the game that neither credits it as a good game nor a success. May be some people just have terrible taste in games and are completely oblivious to a truly bad game. Quality is not down to opinion and can't be bartered over. If a game is bad: it shows. Applying your logic: no game can possibly be better than any other game because at least one person must like a game and there is no such thing as a bad game therefore. 

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

But for him to say this is the worst game ever is just unbelievable. How on earth could this be the worst game ever. But wait maby that was just his opponion. Because this game is certainly not a bad game. Thats just his oppinion. Yes E.T is a bad game but im sure there are people out there that disagree. There always is no matter wat game we r discussing about. Any way wat im trying to prove is, if he thinks this is the worst game ever, He probably has only played very few game titles.

 bilbyc0m wrote:

Yes E.T is a bad game but im sure there are people out there that disagree.

Thank you, that's all I wanted to hear. I just wanted you to understand that some games are just plain bad regardless of people's opinions. Not necessarily this one but there are such things as bad games as quality is not always debatable.

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

But he stated this is the worst game ever? Is he insane?

 bilbyc0m wrote:

But he stated this is the worst game ever? Is he insane?

I just reckon he's stricken with exageration-itis. That's all.

---

Sacrificing virgins since '06 ;)

"Dost thou come here to whine?" - Hamlet : V.I

 bilbyc0m wrote:

But he stated this is the worst game ever? Is he insane?

Ofcouse its not the single worst game ever, you moron. Obviously I was exaggerating, but bottom line, this is a HORRIBLE game. The fact that you're still stuck on this, months after I originally posted this is embarassing.

It's obvious you are a child, and weren't around for E.T. Please, stop referencing it.

How can anyone take you seriously when you can't spell opinion?

Lotr BFME 2 is not a fantastic game, far from it. I enjoyed playing it, but its a terrible RTS. Go play starcraft, company of heroes, age of empires, or practically any PC RTS and you'll see how primitive LOTR BFME 2 on 360 is.

" I paid $120  the day it came out and every cent was worth it. It has been one of my most tresured 360 games ever"

Classic fanboy point of view. I purchased (Insert product here) so it must be good. You're trying to justify the months worth of allowance you wasted on this terrible game. If you paid 120$ for this clearly atrocious game, all I can say is sorry.

You're a blatant sega fanboy.

Sega's only "great mascot" was sonic. And he's no longer a great mascot. He is irrelevant, and so are mascots.

"So unless u are god, u cant decide on which games go in the bad section and which games go in the good section"

   Whens the last time god has decided if a consumer product is good or bad? God isn't the videogame authority, I am. For that matter, when's the last time God has decided anything? It's 2009, Darwin ftw.


Im afraid this kid just has bad taste in games. Two worlds is on his gamertag too. Years from now, maybe he'll look back on this thread and realize how wrong he was.


Though, I do feel the need to thank you, bilbyc0m. In my OP, I said, "Anyone who likes this game, for any other reason than having a sub-preschool intelligence level, is flat out insane."
   
   Clearly, you do have a sub-preschool intelligence level. Thank you for proving my hypothesis.

---

 AKSIENER wrote:

was the hampster cool at least?

what an angry post, i like the game on the ps2, might as well pick it up for the 360.

---

Matt 19:19 Your biggest asset.

Yes, buy this game dont listen to Revolution. hes probs on drugs.

Aparently half of the people on these forums are on drugs, because most of the people here agree this game sucks.

---

 AKSIENER wrote:

was the hampster cool at least?

I picked up this game yesterday, for $10 at Gamestop, and I think it's fun. Sure the mini games can get aggravating at times but what games don't?  Would I have paid $60 for it? Not a chance, but it is a fun to play when you're trying to relax or just trying to raise your gamer score.

 JDWilsonUK wrote:

I thought it was a pretty decent game when I had it. But what do you expect from a Sonic title. it's aimed for kids. Though I agree on the characters, never heard of most of them.

yeah exept the jet set radio,nights and golden axe ones

---

the look look at my thread/guide for warriors orochi.
at this link:
http://forums.xbox.com/19110804/ShowPost.aspx

 Thumbs 0f Fury wrote:

 bilbyc0m wrote:

I hav my oppinions. the only reason i was playing halo 6 days ago was because i wanted to try out the legendary map pack i bought. I do not enjoy gears of war or halo 3 and any cod games. I find them to be laggy, overrated and overpopulated. those (bad games) you were talking about i actually enjoy and i play sega games alot because i grew up with the saturn and the dreamcast. So keep ur oppinions to urself and stop complaining and wining like a 2 year old biatch and be thankful u even the technology we have 2day. U probably spend more time wining about games than actually playing them. Seriously get a life man.

Dude, I grew up with Sega. The first console I owned was a Megadrive and the first game I played was Sonic. But just because I have fond memories of Sega doesn't mean everything they churn out some 18 years later is going to be solid gold. If the game didn't have some of Sega's characters and stages you wouldn't even give this game the time of day. No one would.
But here's the bottom line and it's my opinion so don't take it as gospel: the game is simplistic and shallow but can be fun. It's suitable for children, people upping their gamerscore or whoever got it free with an Arcade console (like myself). It will not be remembered in years to come and is simply Sega trying to breathe life into characters who have been dying for years by making an inferior Mario Tennis clone.
But listen: I DO play it from time to time not because it's a fantastic game but because it can be fun and is a change of pace from some of the grittier games I own. But I stick by my original statement and nothing could ever possibly change my mind: CoD, Halo and Gears will ALWAYS be far superior games.

you said it all

---

the look look at my thread/guide for warriors orochi.
at this link:
http://forums.xbox.com/19110804/ShowPost.aspx

Finaly got it today, i need some 360 games that i can play in front of the new born,  left 4 dead and Rainbow six vegas might be a tad noisy and disturbing for a bub to listen too.

at $30 Australian, its a great price, i love the ps2 version my girlfriend has. I would'nt  recconmend this for the full rrp, so maybe that is where some people judge the game too harshly, because they paid the full price. Picking it up a year later for a 1/3 of the RRP is more suited. But if i had a 100 bucks to spend on every new title, i wouldnt complain. its refreshing change too snipering zombies or crashing into a freeway full of cars.

Great fan service aswell. I loved alex kidd to death, more so than sonic. I hope jet set radio gets a sequal, seems like an easy goldmine for sega to go to one day. the tennis is pretty good aswell, just a slightly watered down version of VT3. I cant wait to complete the full 100 challenges, but this time for achievement points.

---

Matt 19:19 Your biggest asset.

Hey SOG im aussie as well. do u want a game at all?