Search:
My Xbox

TNA iMPACT!™

Started by SilentOblivion1 at 10-26-2009 4:22 PM. Topic has 32 replies.
Sort Posts:    
Print Search
Page 2 of 2 (33 items)
< 1 2

   10-26-2009, 4:22 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Stings retirement at Bound For Glory?
 WAKEFAN1557 wrote:
 SilentOblivion1 wrote:
wasnt AJ the first TNA champion?


and what i dont like bout WWE now is that people like Jeff Hardy, Christian, Edge, Big Daddy V, William Regal, Mark Henry etc are World Champion competitors but back in the day theyd be lucky to get a European Championship shot cause they were mid card competitors at best. they havent got any better at wrestling so why are they high up in the ranking now.


that statement i consider to be a little ignorant. thats how the wrestling buisness works. you start off mid card at best and then they build you to a main event wrestlers.  its a smart move and has been around since since wrestling started.


well i know it sounds abit ignorant but with the talent involved i wouldnt say it is.
these guys werent stars then and they shouldnt be stars now.
but with the WWE roster, these are prob the best and thats quite bad.

they just dont have the stars they use to like Stone Cold, The Rock, fair do's they got Taker, HHH and HBK still but they are all getting on abit.

the newer talent in WWE doesnt beat the younger TNA roster, i hope WWE gets back on its feet the way it use to be. i loved WWF as a kid and wish i could love WWE as an adult
xbox 360 gamer since 19th april 2009.
100%
5 retail
1 arcade

WWE Gamerscore as of 8:21pm 21/11/09
3495/5000
   Report 

   10-26-2009, 7:55 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Stings retirement at Bound For Glory?
 SilentOblivion1 wrote:
 WAKEFAN1557 wrote:
 SilentOblivion1 wrote:
wasnt AJ the first TNA champion?


and what i dont like bout WWE now is that people like Jeff Hardy, Christian, Edge, Big Daddy V, William Regal, Mark Henry etc are World Champion competitors but back in the day theyd be lucky to get a European Championship shot cause they were mid card competitors at best. they havent got any better at wrestling so why are they high up in the ranking now.


that statement i consider to be a little ignorant. thats how the wrestling buisness works. you start off mid card at best and then they build you to a main event wrestlers.  its a smart move and has been around since since wrestling started.


well i know it sounds abit ignorant but with the talent involved i wouldnt say it is.
these guys werent stars then and they shouldnt be stars now.
but with the WWE roster, these are prob the best and thats quite bad.

they just dont have the stars they use to like Stone Cold, The Rock, fair do's they got Taker, HHH and HBK still but they are all getting on abit.

the newer talent in WWE doesnt beat the younger TNA roster, i hope WWE gets back on its feet the way it use to be. i loved WWF as a kid and wish i could love WWE as an adult

triple h the rock stone cold hbk etc. all big names in wrestling were mid carders at one point and were not main eventers. they were built into them.  thats what they are doing now. building these young guys up.  wwe does a better job of that than tna though tna is turning it around.

Undisputed Top Team
   Report 

   10-28-2009, 9:43 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Stings retirement at Bound For Glory?
 WAKEFAN1557 wrote:
 SilentOblivion1 wrote:
 WAKEFAN1557 wrote:
 SilentOblivion1 wrote:
wasnt AJ the first TNA champion?


and what i dont like bout WWE now is that people like Jeff Hardy, Christian, Edge, Big Daddy V, William Regal, Mark Henry etc are World Champion competitors but back in the day theyd be lucky to get a European Championship shot cause they were mid card competitors at best. they havent got any better at wrestling so why are they high up in the ranking now.


that statement i consider to be a little ignorant. thats how the wrestling buisness works. you start off mid card at best and then they build you to a main event wrestlers.  its a smart move and has been around since since wrestling started.


well i know it sounds abit ignorant but with the talent involved i wouldnt say it is.
these guys werent stars then and they shouldnt be stars now.
but with the WWE roster, these are prob the best and thats quite bad.

they just dont have the stars they use to like Stone Cold, The Rock, fair do's they got Taker, HHH and HBK still but they are all getting on abit.

the newer talent in WWE doesnt beat the younger TNA roster, i hope WWE gets back on its feet the way it use to be. i loved WWF as a kid and wish i could love WWE as an adult

triple h the rock stone cold hbk etc. all big names in wrestling were mid carders at one point and were not main eventers. they were built into them.  thats what they are doing now. building these young guys up.  wwe does a better job of that than tna though tna is turning it around.


there's still plenty of guys on both rosters that go underutilized. but i look at it, that it's because TNA and WWE both have way too many superstars on their rosters and they simply can't use them all properly which is a shame
GO RIDERS GO!!! 2009 GREY CUP CHAMPIONS!!!
   Report 
Page 2 of 2 (33 items)
< 1 2

©2009 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved