UnyoBro wrote:
The point is if people weren't so apathetic about people boosting for achievements then maybe we'd have a system in place to actually judge accomplishments. I'm sure Microsoft takes notice of all the cheaters and they love it, people buy/rent more games if they can get worthless achievements.
Blame the cheaters for all the crap games coming out. If people will buy anything to boost thier gamerscore then companies will release almost anything as long as it has achievements attached to it.
Since games have had reward systems or goals like that people have
tried to find the fastest way to gain them. Boosting, ect. So like
you told me it would be impossible for an online gaming community to
act gentlemanly it would also be highly unlikely that a community
wouldn't boost for their challenges, achievements, upgrades, or
whatever the game happens to have.
So this means we should just shrug our shoulders and give up? Sorry but I don't like cheaters of any kind and I'll talk about it when and wherever I feel like it. I just hope some people take notice and spread the word.
exactly you know in the Quake wars tournament/ contest the top person spent 50 hours in a 1vs 1 no bot private online system link matches and sat there destroying and repairing an APC to earn points, yes because to find the best Quake wars players was whoever had the highest points, the points meant to be for winning matches and doing other things legitamately online not boosting to get free stuff.
If people gave more of a damn about people exploiting games be it boosting or cheating etc then maybe just maybe companies could have contests and run the to completion but thanks to boosters, glitchers etc no-one gets anything heck half the contests get cancelled now thanks to this so no-one wins