a7xrocker24 wrote:Okay, I may be a bit old fashion, but I'm not really sure about just what the reviewers were ranting about. Okay, this is no 10/10 game, but it's a fun and average title. Why must every darn game anymore have such high expectations? I thought Fracture pretty much lived up to its promise - an average game with a fun gimmick, yet it felt like reviewers were expecting something that'd change the world. I just don't get it. I've played my fair share of crap games. I've played games that were seriously a technicaly mess. But this isn't one of those. It's a technically sound game, but it's just average, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.What say you?
HitmanOOOO wrote:I wouldn't say everyone is like that. I completely respect your take on the game. I personally did not like the game. I never could make it to the end without growing tired of it. I did get stuck on one section but even leading into it I was getting bored.I'm just not that impressed. But that is just my take. That's what is so great about gaming...we can all have our own likes and dislikes.
Hex Blade wrote:Well i just finished Act 1 last night and i have to say, as crazy as it might sound, i've having more fun playing Fracture than i did playing Gears of War 2.Which basically proves that everyone has there own opintions of games.The cover system for this game is basically, raise the ground in front of you to create a wall....It's just genius!!! This game also proves that you should'nt trust games reviewers.