You're right, quitters are the worst. When I see someone who has more wins than losses then you know they are going to quit sometime during the game. Then they wonder why they have "Quit Early" bad feedback.
I don't see the point in having 58 wins and 4 losses if that's not your real score. To me, it shows they are worse players than people who actually suck at the game.
#7 gets on my nerves too. Many games have I seen people wanting brick when no one has brick. It isn't that hard to hit LB and check. Some even use the soldier hoping to get this imaginary brick card that every one has.
#3 is worse when the player is still putting the robber on you when you have 3 points and someone has 8 points and left to do what they want.
Great game but some people out there are idiots.
DJD29 wrote: You're right, quitters are the worst. When I see someone who has more wins than losses then you know they are going to quit sometime during the game. Then they wonder why they have "Quit Early" bad feedback. I don't see the point in having 58 wins and 4 losses if that's not your real score. To me, it shows they are worse players than people who actually suck at the game. #7 gets on my nerves too. Many games have I seen people wanting brick when no one has brick. It isn't that hard to hit LB and check. Some even use the soldier hoping to get this imaginary brick card that every one has. #3 is worse when the player is still putting the robber on you when you have 3 points and someone has 8 points and left to do what they want. Great game but some people out there are idiots.
Good one. That's really annoying. Makes you wish you could reach through their TV set, give them a cuff up side their head and press the B button for them.
DrAtomic1 wrote:Also a new trend seems to be to target the weakest player on the board with the robber, whilst in theory this may work out you are still hurting yourself if you aren't destined to score that win yourself. But it gets really annoying when people continue to do this while you can safely assume that a player other then the one who is place the robber is within reach to win the game.
DrAtomic1 wrote:Also... players using fastforward is extremely annoying, at least show me a red cross if you dont want to trade, but if you are not going to bother to even look expect incoming soldiers/robbers and no trades or increased prices on trades. Bottomline, fastforwarding is rude.
skrame wrote: DrAtomic1 wrote: Also... players using fastforward is extremely annoying, at least show me a red cross if you dont want to trade, but if you are not going to bother to even look expect incoming soldiers/robbers and no trades or increased prices on trades. Bottomline, fastforwarding is rude.I think when you fastforward, the game automatically puts up the red cross for you.
DrAtomic1 wrote: Also... players using fastforward is extremely annoying, at least show me a red cross if you dont want to trade, but if you are not going to bother to even look expect incoming soldiers/robbers and no trades or increased prices on trades. Bottomline, fastforwarding is rude.
skrame wrote: DrAtomic1 wrote: Also a new trend seems to be to target the weakest player on the board with the robber, whilst in theory this may work out you are still hurting yourself if you aren't destined to score that win yourself. But it gets really annoying when people continue to do this while you can safely assume that a player other then the one who is place the robber is within reach to win the game.This is actually the only reason I'll quit a game. I don't mind losing, but when I'm being targeted I'm going to take off. I was in a game the other day where the other three players all had 7 victory points or more, and I had only 3. I don't mind that my "put starting settlements on a 5/6 wheat junction and a low-point (2) wheat port" plan didn't work out. But when the other three players started using all their soldiers and 7 rolls on me, I just quit out of the game. The three of them were laughing their asses off. Haha, let me just sit here for 20 more minutes while you pull this crap. Just kidding, you can play against Genghis Khan instead. Let's see if you have as much fun doing that.
DrAtomic1 wrote: Also a new trend seems to be to target the weakest player on the board with the robber, whilst in theory this may work out you are still hurting yourself if you aren't destined to score that win yourself. But it gets really annoying when people continue to do this while you can safely assume that a player other then the one who is place the robber is within reach to win the game.
Dernwb wrote: If you walk off without your controller your just rude.