Kynetic wrote:And probably the fact you see loads of Jews burning in a church.
im pretty sure there were no jews in any churches unless i missed that part
NiceCheese wrote: Kynetic wrote:And probably the fact you see loads of Jews burning in a church. im pretty sure there were no jews in any churches unless i missed that part
there were people burning in a church but the game never labels anybody a jew.
QuickReflexes wrote:Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M?
there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently.
the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics.
SolidMussel wrote: QuickReflexes wrote:Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M? there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently. the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics.
yo buddy shut the *** up this game does not have bad graphics
NiceCheese wrote: SolidMussel wrote: QuickReflexes wrote:Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M? there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently. the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics. yo buddy shut the *** up this game does not have bad graphics
cutscenes have good graphics but thats it. honestly compare this games graphics to gears, pgr, graw's single player, perfect dark, splintercell double agent, vegas.
if it were a ps2 game the graphics would be good, but this is 360 where graphics are the most focused attribute of a game that developers want to get right. even though gamers dont care too much about graphics apparently developers do.
Lol. The graphics for The Outfit are pretty good as it was released shortly after launch. Now Gears of War is the 360 at its best right now. That's no better then comparing Kameo to Gears of War becuase Gears of War is operating under a stonger engine, and being push for realistic visuals. Now to compare The Outfit to PDZ and say PDZ has better graphics is sad as they use the same engine and both look a like in terms of graphics and presentation anyways.
SolidMussel wrote: NiceCheese wrote: SolidMussel wrote: QuickReflexes wrote:Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M? there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently. the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics. yo buddy shut the *** up this game does not have bad graphics cutscenes have good graphics but thats it. honestly compare this games graphics to gears, pgr, graw's single player, perfect dark, splintercell double agent, vegas. if it were a ps2 game the graphics would be good, but this is 360 where graphics are the most focused attribute of a game that developers want to get right. even though gamers dont care too much about graphics apparently developers do.
Hey Buddy, You do realize that The Outfit was basically a launch title and the developers first game on a next gen system? You can't campare it to games that are more resent, like Gears. Which I might add ONLY focused on graphics instead of bringing a fun and lasting game out on the market. Graphics are nice, but I actually want to HAVE FUN PLAYING THE GAME, like Outfit.
THIS GAME KICKS *** YEAH!!!!
DRE MAN13 wrote: SolidMussel wrote: NiceCheese wrote: SolidMussel wrote: QuickReflexes wrote:Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M? there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently. the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics. yo buddy shut the *** up this game does not have bad graphics cutscenes have good graphics but thats it. honestly compare this games graphics to gears, pgr, graw's single player, perfect dark, splintercell double agent, vegas. if it were a ps2 game the graphics would be good, but this is 360 where graphics are the most focused attribute of a game that developers want to get right. even though gamers dont care too much about graphics apparently developers do. Hey Buddy, You do realize that The Outfit was basically a launch title and the developers first game on a next gen system? You can't campare it to games that are more resent, like Gears. Which I might add ONLY focused on graphics instead of bringing a fun and lasting game out on the market. Graphics are nice, but I actually want to HAVE FUN PLAYING THE GAME, like Outfit.
first off that sentence i bolded says the same thing you did. anyway im pretty sure the outfit came out in march 2006. other games that came out march 2006 or before were fight night, kameo, perfect dark, pgr, condemned, oblivion, ghost recon, and dead or alive 4. each one of those games has better graphics than the outfit. the only game i can think of on the 360 that has worse graphics is thaw.
and all i said at first was outfit = call of duty with bad graphics. if you havent played call of duty, it is a great game.
NiceCheese wrote:WTF THE OUTFIT IS NOTHING LIKE COD IN FACT IT IS COMPETLEY DIFFERENT GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT AND STOP POSTING HOW CRAP YOU THINK THIS GAME IS ON THIS FORUM
the outfit is like call of duty content wise. same amount of blood, violence, and language. thats all im trying to say. if you remember way back to post one, the thread is supposed to be about why this game is rated m.
NiceCheese wrote:i dont recall seeing much blood, if any, in either games
thats why it could be rated T.
KlownMaster wrote:It's really too bad that it got an M rating, if it would have gotten the T rating it deserved, it may have sold better.
How so?
NiceCheese wrote: KlownMaster wrote:It's really too bad that it got an M rating, if it would have gotten the T rating it deserved, it may have sold better. How so?
all the little kids with whos parents refuse to let them play m games would have bought it.
SolidMussel wrote: NiceCheese wrote: KlownMaster wrote:It's really too bad that it got an M rating, if it would have gotten the T rating it deserved, it may have sold better. How so? all the little kids with whos parents refuse to let them play m games would have bought it.
No doubt they will go behind their parents backs and buy the game anyway, those young rapscallions
NiceCheese wrote:who cares anyway i mean i know people as old 13 who play GOW which is strangly odd