DRE MAN13 wrote:
SolidMussel wrote:
NiceCheese wrote:
SolidMussel wrote:
QuickReflexes wrote:
Why is this game rated M? I played the demo and it was GREAT! I saw no blood, no gore, And heard one cuss word, (It wasnt that bad) Is the campaign bloody and such? Is there a reason that this game is rated M?
there is a small amount of blood. gore is only there if you blow someone up with a cannon. it doesnt look like gore, but esrb finds it offensive apparently.
the game could easily be teen. its pretty much call of duty with bad graphics.
yo buddy shut the *** up this game does not have bad graphics
cutscenes have good graphics but thats it. honestly compare this games graphics to gears, pgr, graw's single player, perfect dark, splintercell double agent, vegas.
if it were a ps2 game the graphics would be good, but this is 360 where graphics are the most focused attribute of a game that developers want to get right. even though gamers dont care too much about graphics apparently developers do.
Hey Buddy, You do realize that The Outfit was basically a launch title and the developers first game on a next gen system? You can't campare it to games that are more resent, like Gears. Which I might add ONLY focused on graphics instead of bringing a fun and lasting game out on the market. Graphics are nice, but I actually want to HAVE FUN PLAYING THE GAME, like Outfit.
first off that sentence i bolded says the same thing you did. anyway im pretty sure the outfit came out in march 2006. other games that came out march 2006 or before were fight night, kameo, perfect dark, pgr, condemned, oblivion, ghost recon, and dead or alive 4. each one of those games has better graphics than the outfit. the only game i can think of on the 360 that has worse graphics is thaw.
and all i said at first was outfit = call of duty with bad graphics. if you havent played call of duty, it is a great game.
The word "ill" should be used in conversation more often
GH2-12th
GH3-15th
Rockband-46th (drums)
