xxRKxx TarGEt wrote:Op, play with friends = problem solved.
Manny1222 wrote: So why don't all of you that do this play the game the way it's supposed to be played?
Gapper Killer wrote: Manny1222 wrote: So why don't all of you that do this play the game the way it's supposed to be played?Im not being an ** here but its your definition of "how it was meant to be played". What Im trying to say is...Not trying to be "that guy" because no effort needed. I am that guy, if we ever get paired into a annex (not a gamemode I like at all) I will spend the entire time killing and never going for the circle. The reason why? I play the map packs and get annex every now and then and I just don't want to play annex, so I play it like execution. The thing is when you have just 2 guys max doing this and their at least decent at it, it works to your advantage. Its not about exp or anything like that, if people are trying to get 1/4 of their kills counted for exp then their dumb, its about having fun.
Manny1222 wrote: Gapper Killer wrote: Manny1222 wrote: So why don't all of you that do this play the game the way it's supposed to be played?Im not being an ** here but its your definition of "how it was meant to be played". What Im trying to say is...Not trying to be "that guy" because no effort needed. I am that guy, if we ever get paired into a annex (not a gamemode I like at all) I will spend the entire time killing and never going for the circle. The reason why? I play the map packs and get annex every now and then and I just don't want to play annex, so I play it like execution. The thing is when you have just 2 guys max doing this and their at least decent at it, it works to your advantage. Its not about exp or anything like that, if people are trying to get 1/4 of their kills counted for exp then their dumb, its about having fun.Then I hope you can handle it. And the objective of annex is to capture the hill and get reach the required amount of points before the opponent does. I as well play to get as many kills as possible. But I also make it my main task to get to the hill. And it's not my definition, it is Epic's. Look it up.
Manny1222 wrote:And at least in guardian you can take away your own life.
Manny1222 wrote:Thanks. But these people need to be punished! It's terrible when everyone else quits then it's practically impossible. The last two teams that did that finally finished the game after they knew we weren't taking any crap and almost cost them the match when it was 3 on 5. But what does it matter when you have 100 kills? And during that half hour game you would get those many kills anyways but instead of one long game you do it in 3 short ones. Everyone that reads these. Please be as thoughtful of others so that everyone enjoys this game as much as possible. Or you might be doing it outside your video game and someone might actually punch you in the face.
Berad Jenkins wrote: Manny1222 wrote:Thanks. But these people need to be punished! It's terrible when everyone else quits then it's practically impossible. The last two teams that did that finally finished the game after they knew we weren't taking any crap and almost cost them the match when it was 3 on 5. But what does it matter when you have 100 kills? And during that half hour game you would get those many kills anyways but instead of one long game you do it in 3 short ones. Everyone that reads these. Please be as thoughtful of others so that everyone enjoys this game as much as possible. Or you might be doing it outside your video game and someone might actually punch you in the face.People see the big numbers at the end of their "super round" and they get the false notion that it's better/faster than playing annex how its intended.oh well, i mean they can play how they want right?
Manny1222 wrote: Berad Jenkins wrote: Manny1222 wrote:Thanks. But these people need to be punished! It's terrible when everyone else quits then it's practically impossible. The last two teams that did that finally finished the game after they knew we weren't taking any crap and almost cost them the match when it was 3 on 5. But what does it matter when you have 100 kills? And during that half hour game you would get those many kills anyways but instead of one long game you do it in 3 short ones. Everyone that reads these. Please be as thoughtful of others so that everyone enjoys this game as much as possible. Or you might be doing it outside your video game and someone might actually punch you in the face.People see the big numbers at the end of their "super round" and they get the false notion that it's better/faster than playing annex how its intended.oh well, i mean they can play how they want right?Exactly! It just sucks the fun out of it, but I'm going to try to communicate with my teammates so they don't quit when this happens and we can fight back.I also did the math to prove that it makes more sense to play the game as it's intended to be played than to play a super round.Let's say we are playing Annex so what we would get to points that go towards our experience in accordance to the points we get in the game is a ratio of .23 in accordance to this,So the formula to find out the amount of experience we would get is .23 x A x B=CA=Number of points accumulated during the match.B=Number of gamesC=Number of Experience we getSo in a game that lasts 1 hour, you get 10000 points so that would be 2300 experience points that go towards your rank.Now compared to 5 short games during the in the same amount of time it would take you to have that really long match. And you get 3000 points in each match. 3450 Experience points would go towards your rank. And since it's double experience weekend then we just double the experience. But still, playing more games rewards you with more experience than playing less and longer games.
Bycin wrote:I agree with you that people should just play for the win, but unfortunately your math doesn't prove anything. In the single game, they gain 10000 points, but in the 5 short games they are gaining 15000. Of course they would get more towards their total XP if they were gaining more total points. Your math assumes that they will average 3000 per each of the 5 games when if you break down the single game into 5, they are only gaining 2000. You can't base a formula on assumptions, I am afraid.