gappers wrote:
Tyson was a brute and thats that. He had a decent hook and upper cut but when you try to compare him to ALI you are just wrong. Ali was in a class to his self. tyson had a very short reach and stance. watch his old fights he had to be up close. sometimes he would throw a lunge hook but like I said sometimes and his jab was awfull no comparrison to Ali. Ali cold dance around for 15 rounds if he had to he was an extraordinary athlette. He had a large repituar of punchs were tyson just basically tried to use his brute force to knock you out not really any skill involved other than just putting all his might in every punch and as for his bobbing and weaving just ask Buster Douglas how that blocking style effected him. and again not to say tyson was a complete bum fighter he did win and many times by 1st round knock outs and was the champ no doubt. But the people he fought were bums there selfs. None of them were the calibur fighter that Ali was. and thts all I will say about. Muhammad Ali is #1 Gappers is #2 Tyson is a Brute
Buster Douglas was a great fighter himself, but after that loss Tyson was never the same and that is what you may be going off. When Lennox Lewis beat him as well as Evander Holyfield. Before the Douglas fight, Tyson was very skilled and his bobbing and weaving was a very effective tactic.
Ali was a very boring fighter, and while I do agree he was a skilled, accomplished fighter, he is a bit overhyped as far as what he could do. He was a good boxer, sure, but Tyson really revolutionized for a long while when he was at his height.
Need help? Shoot me a PM!
Xbox Forum Reg Leaderboard