Excellent information, thanks! I'm kind of curious as to why Anandtech's numbers differ than yours on the falcon so much... Take a look:
http://www.anandtech.com/gadgets/showdoc.aspx?i=3152&p=6This is an old article and does compare Falcon to Xenon. Their Falcon's numbers were 100w dashboard and 120 playing a game vs your 95/108 numbers. I can only assume the difference is the test equipment used? It's a difference of 5% and 10% respectively. If we adjust anandtech's Xenon 149/173 numbers down by 5 and 10 percent, we get 142 and 156. So, adding to your table we get:
Jasper = 87 watts, dashboard, 97 watts, playing game.
Falcon = 95 watts dashboard, 108 watts, playing game.
Xenon = 142 watts dashboard, 156 watts playing game.
Do everyone agree with my calculations to account for the difference in test equipment? Either way, we can see a BIG improvement in Jasper over the originals and a significant difference between Jasper and Falcon even.
JWSpeed wrote:
First test results, watts. Using the same setup, except power supply.
Standard TV, and 20 gb HDD.
Jasper = 87 watts, dashboard, 97 watts, playing game.
Falcon = 95 watts dashboard, 108 watts, playing game.
Tests using a P3 kill a watt meter, 15 min. warm up.
<><> Semper Fidelis <><>
Ubuntu Linux 64-bit
iPhone 3GS 16GB