JD 2020 wrote:
TexKJ wrote:
LOUISE CYPHRE wrote:
Gator26 wrote:
GPasXBL wrote:
Kill streaks should be taken out of the game, they encourage camping and hiding. They should be awarded for reaching a certain number of points instead, regardless of deaths in between.
I completely agree with you.
I agree as well.
"Happy Drinking"
As do I.
Isn't the other side of the coin that kill streaks encourages smarter play, causing players to be less cavalier with their own and their teammates lives?
That is the other side of the argument, but in my opinion it promotes camping more than anything else. I liked the way your employer set it up in COD3.
At a certain number of kills you'd get extras, like smoke, more rifle grenades, bigger artillery barrages, etc.
It just seemed more balanced than not having many deaths, getting whether through luck or skill a good kill streak going, and getting an arsenal that can wipe out a lot of people.
In COD3, unless you were a scout, your kills on the leaderboard were determined by kills you made yourself without help from above.
Also, JD 2020, I just got an e-mail today saying Activision announced WaW. So, can you confirm if there will be ranked and unranked matches?. I could have swore I read or heard there were, but CHEFS made me doubt my own ears.
Other people have brought this up as well, and it would be nice to know.
It's unwise to be too sure of one`s own wisdom. It's healthy to be reminded the strongest may weaken and the wisest might err