Shamrock wrote:
Anyway the locking or deleting threads doesn't bother me at all. There are times that needs to be done. What bothers me is Mod's not having the common courtesy to tell you what you did wrong. Deacon I respect you because almost every single time you've locked a thread you are the last post in that thread explaining why the post was locked. You did it to me once when I posted something that was already posted. That is the proper way most message boards operate.
I think Deacon would be the first to admit that he doesn't make the last post in every single thread he locks. With the magintude of threads that are locked, most of the time that is impossible.
I personally had actually had a member report me because they felt I was innapropriate in posting a reason why the thread was locked before locking it because they felt I was acting as if on a power trip by having the last word.
It's a no-win situation. Some people appreciate it, others don't. If it is a post that is off-topic I have no problem posting the reason it is being closed. But if it is an angry flame filled posts.. announcing you are the one locking it is just opening it up to a ton of abusive PM's and constant harrasment. Many times after that some people feel the need to post another post complaining that their post has been deleted and desire a flame-filled off topic discussion on the unfairness. Beleive me... embarrasment has nothing to do with it :)
Usually if it is regular posters that I am familiar with (and believe me, I am familiar with a lot of the posters who may have no idea who I am) I usually always post a reson why. But when you are sifting through hundreds of reported threads, sometimes urgency to remove offensive posts takes precendence over documenting the reason the thread was deleted.
Out of curiousity.. why are you stating Deacon does things one way and MS does things another? When Deacon locks a thread he is acting as a MOD and follows the same rules. And as it has been stated many times, MOD's are not employees of MS. So in that sense, saying Deacon does things one way and a MOD does it a different way, isn't accurate.
About the CUL being lowered... it really isn't necessary to stare a reason why since the offender is usually very aware why it was since it is only done under certain circumstances.
Post provided 'AS IS'; confers no rights, dude!
twitter.com/kikikat
www.breakingthegame.com