Search:
My Xbox

Battlestations™ Midway

Started by JONBOY1977 at 03-19-2007 1:07 AM. Topic has 249 replies.
Sort Posts:    
Print Search
Page 8 of 9 (250 items)
« First ... < 5 6 7 8 9 >

   03-19-2007, 1:07 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

All the earlier talk of friendly fire reminds me of an old saying that my grandad used to tell me.

In world war 2, when the British opened fire the germans ducked

when the Germans opened fire, the British ducked.

When the Americans opened fire, Every F**ker  Ducked


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   03-19-2007, 1:15 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
All you would have to do is push a button.   So rookie would be a easy button like staples and Vetran level would be a hard to push button maybe 200 pounds of pressure to push it.
   Report 

   03-19-2007, 11:35 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

 KRAZY ERIC wrote:
All you would have to do is push a button.   So rookie would be a easy button like staples and Vetran level would be a hard to push button maybe 200 pounds of pressure to push it.

No offense, but I think you lack of realistic thinking. Do you consider modern warfare as a situation where you just have to push a button?

If that is the case then what´s up with all the supercarriers, jetfighters, landbased military forces and so on? Is that just for show while the brass is sitting back home pushing buttons?


Now they see what will be, blinded eyes to see.
   Report 

   03-20-2007, 2:44 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

Will you Sally's stop...

This thread is dead. As soon as the nuke came about, "war" became "who has the balls to end the World?".

BTW, The cowards known as "Freedom fighters/terrorists" do. Yup, they are great.

   Report 

   03-20-2007, 2:48 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 Kold DK wrote:

 KRAZY ERIC wrote:
All you would have to do is push a button.   So rookie would be a easy button like staples and Vetran level would be a hard to push button maybe 200 pounds of pressure to push it.

No offense, but I think you lack of realistic thinking. Do you consider modern warfare as a situation where you just have to push a button?

If that is the case then what´s up with all the supercarriers, jetfighters, landbased military forces and so on? Is that just for show while the brass is sitting back home pushing buttons?

I believe he his refering to cruise missles...
Make xbox live cost more!


   Report 

   03-20-2007, 2:53 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

How about a battlestations game in the style of crimson skies. That way you keep the propellor type planes, and could have cool looking subs and ships, but you could also have Blimps and Airships.


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   03-20-2007, 3:50 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 JONBOY1977 wrote:

How about a battlestations game in the style of crimson skies. That way you keep the propellor type planes, and could have cool looking subs and ships, but you could also have Blimps and Airships.



That sounds interesting, Americans used airships to escort ships and to also spot enemy submarines. Only one Airship was ever shot down. And none of the ships that were escorted by the airships, sank.

Some airships also carried some depth charges aswell, and other weapons. History is a very interesting subject to learn!
   Report 

   07-09-2007, 1:44 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
U know we might lose ,the US, because of our politician specificly democrats like Hilary clinton, Barack obama who want us to stop fighting to bring freedom that people deserve. What we need to do is get it right the first time. We could have done that Desrt storm 91 but after 45 days we thought we won. 45 DAYS R U KIDDING ME TO TAKE DOWN THE ENTIRE TERRORIST MOVEMENT OF IRAQ. If we had stayed the course and iradicated those b@$tard$ 9/11 may have never happened and if we pull out of Iraq they will come back and attack us again. And the politicains dont care all they want is power they dont care about us we r so easy to destroy. our water and food sources r so easy to contaminate with WMDs so we need to finsh the job. ok i am done with my rant
   Report 

   10-30-2008, 4:32 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 JONBOY1977 wrote:

All the earlier talk of friendly fire reminds me of an old saying that my grandad used to tell me.

In world war 2, when the British opened fire the germans ducked

when the Germans opened fire, the British ducked.

When the Americans opened fire, Every F**ker  Ducked

 

Epic lol


Clan Art of War http://www.clanartofwar.com
   Report 

   11-02-2008, 11:47 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

 

   Report 

   11-12-2008, 10:56 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:
That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!

KEEP DREAMIN BUD...
Abra Kadabra...your a douchbag!!!
   Report 

   11-12-2008, 11:26 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 BOON TARKAS wrote:

Seriously, Canadians might not have a huge army but their Snowmobile Defense Force is top-notch. They blew Iceland out of the water in their last multi-national winter training run.

Can anyone verify this: I have heard that because of the length of Canadian winters and all the snow  that one out of every 12 people there has a genetic anomaly that makes them really, really white, like an albino but with normal eyes. If it's true it's no wonder that the Canucks excel at winter combat.

IT'S TRUE!!!we call them ''ginger kids'' u can easily spot them,they all have red hair an frekels the most popular are Kathy Griffin,carrot top,Mike myers,funny that their all comiedians...o an i almost forgot...''CHUK NORRIS''!!!!
Abra Kadabra...your a douchbag!!!
   Report 

   11-12-2008, 11:39 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 ghostt888 wrote:
 OG Wretch wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 PrimoLoz wrote:
I see people talking about who has the best Navy. I went to a Navy day at a dockyard where i live and i have to say, The German and Netherland Navy had ships wich were more advanced than what the US Navy brought. The British were on par with USA. But ive got to admit that USA has bigger Aircraft carriers and planes (i think).

Also, i bet quite a few Americans didnt know their Navy was invented by somone from Scotland.

thank you! you people dont understand your own damn sociaty. 1 older chinease anti ship missle could cripple a cruiser. You all think your all so high and mighty! the USA has a great milatary but it has so many flaws! Lack of dicipline, victory sickness, cocky, under estimating the enemy, hightly crtical public and weak economie. Your always underestimating the little guy, but you end up geting your butt kicked!

A crippled cruiser does not a war win.

Who the *** are you to say what we know about our own society and not?

High and mighty? :rolleyes: 

Your views/opinions are pretty funny.

Hello pot, this is kettle I just called to tell you that you're black.

I won't even get into flaws since we all have them.

after 500 american casualties, your public will be telling the goverment to pull out and losing a cruiser is an absolutly huge lose! The American navy is a very good navy, but China can match it with there modern ships. Some of these countries defenses are built on gurillia warfare if they are facing an overwhelming foe, look at iraq and imagine facing a professional army with the best small arms etc unlike the Nosin Naget troting insurgents in Iraq

!!!look at iraq!!!we won that war so fast they made movies about how bored our millatery was by being their...''jarhead'' look it up...an if your talking about the war on terror...ill admit were losing that war because we dont know who the enemy is..it could be a kid with a backpak...a woman in a car,their cowards!!thats all their is to it...AMERICA IS THE MOST POWERFULL AN MOST ENVIED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!admit it ...u wish you lived here
Abra Kadabra...your a douchbag!!!
   Report 

   11-12-2008, 11:55 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 ghostt888 wrote:

 K2Valor wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:
you damn americans cannot get over the fact that your not invinsible!
America is the biggest superpower in the world. We are not invincible, but we have the best technology in the world.

NOBODY here has proof that any naval force is better than the next, and I'm not saying I do, but I am going to provide a link.

Why the US Navy is the best

By the way, what makes you think the US Navy isn't as good as any other Navy? And don't say I'm being an ignorant Yankee or something like that.. You are the one being ignorant. You come in here and just say, " US Navy sucks! " When you find me a link that says any other Navy is better than the US, just tell me.

i have not said it sucks, its just i dont think its the best. Cuase its a fact the American Army is not the best in the world. Like if the USA were to attack Swedan, Norway and Finland, you would lose horribly. See its americans who think there invinsible and there country can conquere any where in the world. Like Norway and Swedan have the most advanced (Visby class) ships on the planet. Germany has the most advanced U-boats while the USA has the best subs (Brand new Virginia class). The Canadian navy is very proffesional and high tech, but very small. But America would most likly lose in a ground war adgainst Canada. USA has a great milatary, amazing airforce and good navy, but not the best navy but best airforce.

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the only country in the world thats right the''WORLD'' that has an embassy on every contenent,region an country on the planet...conquere just isnt the word...WE RULE.

An who the *** cares about canada...if the u.s was to go to war(which i wouldnt even call it one,more like take over.)it would last about 1 or two days,i dont even know why im argueing my point with someone who would say that...the U.S losing too canada...lol i think all them celine dion cd's are rotting your brain...


Abra Kadabra...your a douchbag!!!
   Report 

   11-12-2008, 12:07 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 MurderTHAworld wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:
 OG Wretch wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 PrimoLoz wrote:
I see people talking about who has the best Navy. I went to a Navy day at a dockyard where i live and i have to say, The German and Netherland Navy had ships wich were more advanced than what the US Navy brought. The British were on par with USA. But ive got to admit that USA has bigger Aircraft carriers and planes (i think).

Also, i bet quite a few Americans didnt know their Navy was invented by somone from Scotland.

thank you! you people dont understand your own damn sociaty. 1 older chinease anti ship missle could cripple a cruiser. You all think your all so high and mighty! the USA has a great milatary but it has so many flaws! Lack of dicipline, victory sickness, cocky, under estimating the enemy, hightly crtical public and weak economie. Your always underestimating the little guy, but you end up geting your butt kicked!

A crippled cruiser does not a war win.

Who the *** are you to say what we know about our own society and not?

High and mighty? :rolleyes: 

Your views/opinions are pretty funny.

Hello pot, this is kettle I just called to tell you that you're black.

I won't even get into flaws since we all have them.

after 500 american casualties, your public will be telling the goverment to pull out and losing a cruiser is an absolutly huge lose! The American navy is a very good navy, but China can match it with there modern ships. Some of these countries defenses are built on gurillia warfare if they are facing an overwhelming foe, look at iraq and imagine facing a professional army with the best small arms etc unlike the Nosin Naget troting insurgents in Iraq

!!!look at iraq!!!we won that war so fast they made movies about how bored our millatery was by being their...''jarhead'' look it up...an if your talking about the war on terror...ill admit were losing that war because we dont know who the enemy is..it could be a kid with a backpak...a woman in a car,their cowards!!thats all their is to it...AMERICA IS THE MOST POWERFULL AN MOST ENVIED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!admit it ...u wish you lived here

 

I did not want to get into this, but you really are asking for it.

1 - America is not Envied at all. You think most of brazil or italy or England, Holland and a lot of other countries would want to give up the lifestyles they have to live in America. Well you are so wrong its not even funny.

2 - American troops got so bored they started shooting their own troops and theur allies.


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   11-12-2008, 12:14 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 MrSplendido wrote:

 ghostt888 wrote:

thank you! you people dont understand your own damn sociaty. 1 older chinease anti ship missle could cripple a cruiser. You all think your all so high and mighty! the USA has a great milatary but it has so many flaws! Lack of dicipline, victory sickness, cocky, under estimating the enemy, hightly crtical public and weak economie. Your always underestimating the little guy, but you end up geting your butt kicked!!

after 500 american casualties, your public will be telling the goverment to pull out and losing a cruiser is an absolutly huge lose! The American navy is a very good navy, but China can match it with there modern ships. Some of these countries defenses are built on gurillia warfare if they are facing an overwhelming foe, look at iraq and imagine facing a professional army with the best small arms etc unlike the Nosin Naget troting insurgents in Iraq

What. The. ***.

You obviously have some serious *** envy here. Let me break this down for you since you can't even handle simple spelling and grammar. (By the way, milatary, sociaty, gurilla? Are you serious? ARE. YOU. SERIOUS? Really?)

Naval Power - The U.S. has the largest Navy in the World. This is a fact. The United States Navy could take on ANYONE in the World one on one and win based on sheer size alone. My opinion, but it is at least based on hard facts. Naval battles are not fought this way anymore, so this point is moot. Get over it.

Army - I'm sorry, did the invasion of Iraq make you think that the U.S. is going to just come stomping in where ever they damn well please? Look out World, we are coming to Scandinavia! Woooo hoooo! Look out Canada! We want you too! Yes, it's true. The U.S. soldiers are just a bunch of bumbling idiots who have no idea how to even hold a rifle. They are just warm bodies to send in and get shot. Again, I ask you WHAT THE *** DO YOU KNOW?

Get off your anti-American soapbox for a second and try to process a few things before you speak on this again. There is no reason to march ground forces into Canada or any Scandinavian countries. Canada is supposedly our ally. What is the purpose of this "war on Canada" you speak of? Do you have a television? Where do you get the idea that this is how an invasion begins in the first place? Did you see the "shock and awe" campaign by chance? IF, and man this is a big IF, the United States was to ever go to war with Canada, the last thing you would see is a couple hundred thousand troops marching clumsily across the border. See those flashes in the sky? Yeah, those are bombs. Duck and cover you *** tool. You want to throw out hypothetical situations? Try this on for size...

Canada (Or anyone else...besides China) marches on the United States....DISCUSS

The American Public - What do you even know about the American public. We are all just a bunch of fat, stupid, hillbillies, right? A bunch of war mongers with huge hard ones just itching to get in a slap and tickle fight that we hope turns into an all out brawl. You see what the media and your own press tell you to see. Do you know why you only see protestors on television who make it their personal mission to pull out of Iraq? Why you only see what is negative? Because positivity and heartfelt thanks you DON'T SELL. There are many Americans who support the "war" in Iraq. You don't want to hear about that, do you? There are many Americans who are proud that SOMEONE will stand up against dictators and give the powerless a voice. But let me tell you something that the rest of the World seems to not want to pay attention to. NO ONE IS PERFECT. Yes, many things have gone wrong, but where the *** was ANYONE else to help set them straight. Oh, George Bush and the "almighty" U.S. wouldn't let us doing anything. BULL ***!  A lot of countries feel free to criticize what the U.S. (and everyone else in Iraq) is doing, but as much as it's turned into a cluster-F, the "liberation" of Iraq may still prove to be one of the greatest stories of the 21st century. I'll get into that in a moment.

Do you really want to see what the American public is all about? Follow the upcoming election, and take notes. We've just had back to back 8 year presidential  runs that were polar opposites. Did your schools teach you about the American Civil War? Well it's about to happen again, and thank god this time we are going to fight it with our heads and not guns.

Iraq - I'm sorry, have you been over there? I was unaware that it's been a complete loss for coalition troops. In my opinion, I think we should have had a plan in place to get the troops out and let the people of Iraq take over their own country. Whoops...wait a minute? I have an opinion....you have an opinion...they have an opinion now...isn't freedom great? Something as simple as a voicable opinion is something that they did not have up until a few years ago. Have you ever had a family member executed for speaking against something? I doubt you can go into any city in Iraq and find someone who can't recall that ever happening. And yes, SOME people in the United States, some Canadians, some French, some British, ETC ETC ETC take this for granted EVERY SINGLE DAY. Let me ask you something. If the U.S. did not go into Iraq, and let's say 10 years down the road Iraq launches a strike against a peaceful nation with WMDs, who do you think would take the blame? Just a hint, it's certainly not *** Canada. "Your always underestimating the little guy, but you end up geting your butt kicked!" WHERE??? WHEN???? Butt kicked? Are you talking about Iraq? ARE. YOU. SERIOUS???

Let me tell you something else. Do you know who is losing the war in Iraq? THE IRAQI PEOPLE. I'm not talking about some militant Muslims who think the U.S. is the "Great Satan". I'm talking about Hamed Q. Public and his family. They are scared. Scared to stand up and fight against the only thing holding them back....themselves. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. I'd love for a group of Iraqis to come hang out with me one day, JUST ONE DAY. Maybe they could spread the word over there, and it would spread like wildfire. Do you know who can stop the insurgents over there? Again, it's not the U.S..

 

Now this has gotten out of hand and has grown to a post that I bet half the people on this board won't read. *** it, I really don't care. Read it or not, it won't stop me from posting my opinion. Oh wait, there's that thing again...

BRAVO!!!I couldnt have said it better myself...
Abra Kadabra...your a douchbag!!!
   Report 

   11-12-2008, 12:20 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 MurderTHAworld wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 K2Valor wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:
you damn americans cannot get over the fact that your not invinsible!
America is the biggest superpower in the world. We are not invincible, but we have the best technology in the world.

NOBODY here has proof that any naval force is better than the next, and I'm not saying I do, but I am going to provide a link.

Why the US Navy is the best

By the way, what makes you think the US Navy isn't as good as any other Navy? And don't say I'm being an ignorant Yankee or something like that.. You are the one being ignorant. You come in here and just say, " US Navy sucks! " When you find me a link that says any other Navy is better than the US, just tell me.

i have not said it sucks, its just i dont think its the best. Cuase its a fact the American Army is not the best in the world. Like if the USA were to attack Swedan, Norway and Finland, you would lose horribly. See its americans who think there invinsible and there country can conquere any where in the world. Like Norway and Swedan have the most advanced (Visby class) ships on the planet. Germany has the most advanced U-boats while the USA has the best subs (Brand new Virginia class). The Canadian navy is very proffesional and high tech, but very small. But America would most likly lose in a ground war adgainst Canada. USA has a great milatary, amazing airforce and good navy, but not the best navy but best airforce.

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the only country in the world thats right the''WORLD'' that has an embassy on every contenent,region an country on the planet...conquere just isnt the word...WE RULE.

An who the *** cares about canada...if the u.s was to go to war(which i wouldnt even call it one,more like take over.)it would last about 1 or two days,i dont even know why im argueing my point with someone who would say that...the U.S losing too canada...lol i think all them celine dion cd's are rotting your brain...

Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   11-12-2008, 12:20 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 MurderTHAworld wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 K2Valor wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:
you damn americans cannot get over the fact that your not invinsible!
America is the biggest superpower in the world. We are not invincible, but we have the best technology in the world.

NOBODY here has proof that any naval force is better than the next, and I'm not saying I do, but I am going to provide a link.

Why the US Navy is the best

By the way, what makes you think the US Navy isn't as good as any other Navy? And don't say I'm being an ignorant Yankee or something like that.. You are the one being ignorant. You come in here and just say, " US Navy sucks! " When you find me a link that says any other Navy is better than the US, just tell me.

i have not said it sucks, its just i dont think its the best. Cuase its a fact the American Army is not the best in the world. Like if the USA were to attack Swedan, Norway and Finland, you would lose horribly. See its americans who think there invinsible and there country can conquere any where in the world. Like Norway and Swedan have the most advanced (Visby class) ships on the planet. Germany has the most advanced U-boats while the USA has the best subs (Brand new Virginia class). The Canadian navy is very proffesional and high tech, but very small. But America would most likly lose in a ground war adgainst Canada. USA has a great milatary, amazing airforce and good navy, but not the best navy but best airforce.

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the only country in the world thats right the''WORLD'' that has an embassy on every contenent,region an country on the planet...conquere just isnt the word...WE RULE.

An who the *** cares about canada...if the u.s was to go to war(which i wouldnt even call it one,more like take over.)it would last about 1 or two days,i dont even know why im argueing my point with someone who would say that...the U.S losing too canada...lol i think all them celine dion cd's are rotting your brain...

Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   11-12-2008, 9:17 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010

"Patriot: the person who can holler the loudest without knowing what he is hollering about." - Mark Twain.


The USS Johnston charged the Japanese Centre Force by itself. It was a destroyer. I am equally insane over LIVE.
   Report 

   11-13-2008, 2:10 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 JONBOY1977 wrote:
Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.



Name a country that has better training than the US Military?  Behind in tactics and training?  You've got to be kidding.  The only European country even comparable in training is the UK.

The American military dwarfs the European military in both size and capability.  The French, German and British Armies combined are about the size of the US Army.  There is no doubt that the US Army is heads and shoulders more capable and better trained.  Factor in the the USAF and USN, there is no contest. 

Those are the facts, so feel free to try and argue it.

VTX SPARTAN - COL
SpankTheMidget
220,000 Merit

x626x Gurkha - COL
5Ghosts
95,000 Merit
   Report 

   11-13-2008, 3:33 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 VTX SPARTAN wrote:
 JONBOY1977 wrote:
Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.



Name a country that has better training than the US Military?  Behind in tactics and training?  You've got to be kidding.  The only European country even comparable in training is the UK.

The American military dwarfs the European military in both size and capability.  The French, German and British Armies combined are about the size of the US Army.  There is no doubt that the US Army is heads and shoulders more capable and better trained.  Factor in the the USAF and USN, there is no contest. 

Those are the facts, so feel free to try and argue it.

 

Well the British/Australian SAS are generally considered to be the best in the world, and every single US special forces base their traing on SAS tactics and Training.

Plus The British can call on the Ghurkas from Nepal, considered some of the most fearsome fighters around.

And anyone knocking the Canadian miltitary needs to learn a few facts, Canadian soldiers are highly capable and are usually called into action to work with the British.

Some of the most succesfull special ops missions in world war 2 were carried out by Canadian and Australian commandos.

Noone mentions the Swiss or the swedish army, and they are not to be messed with either.

Eveyone knows America would overun most countries by sheer numbers and Technology, but if you matched up man for man you would struggle against a lot of countries.

Because your military is so large, each individual soldier has less time and money spent on his training, all those other countries invest a lot more time and effort into each soldier.

 


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   11-13-2008, 3:52 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 VTX SPARTAN wrote:
 JONBOY1977 wrote:
Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.



Name a country that has better training than the US Military?  Behind in tactics and training?  You've got to be kidding.  The only European country even comparable in training is the UK.

The American military dwarfs the European military in both size and capability.  The French, German and British Armies combined are about the size of the US Army.  There is no doubt that the US Army is heads and shoulders more capable and better trained.  Factor in the the USAF and USN, there is no contest. 

Those are the facts, so feel free to try and argue it.

 

Dont forget the US Friendly fire record, by far the worst anyone has ever seen. You killed more canadians than the enemies did in iraq and afghanistan

Actually bombed allies in Iraq that you were supposed to be providing cover for

Over thirty four instances of friendly fire in a 12 month period  US incidents =34 Other allied countries = 0

And the US militart themselves blamed it all on a lack of training ( thats right your own military admitted it )

Do you know what they had to do to sort it out ( and this is laughable ) They had to ask the british to come over and show them how to recognise British army Landrovers and other vehicles and markings.

Your own military brass also admitted that the US troops may have had trouble recognising other allied countries flags. Your own military had to get anti friendly fire training while they were in iraq.

 

Now this in no way takes away from how brave and genuinely deserving of respect each member of the US military is, but the fact is the Miltary is spending to much on technology and not enough on training.


Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   11-15-2008, 7:44 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
would be cool
   Report 

   11-16-2008, 4:45 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 JONBOY1977 wrote:
 VTX SPARTAN wrote:
 JONBOY1977 wrote:
Apart from the fact that America does not have an embassy in every region on the planet. You think America has conquered the world and rules just because they have a lot of Embassies.

America could not go to war and win in 1 or 3 days you moron.

Seriously, were you born a retard or do you practice at being one every day.

America is a big country and has a large army due to its size, but a lot of countries have better training, and you would get beat by a European coalition. That is a fact, and there is no point in arguing about it. America has the single largest army and would overwhelm any single country, but not Europe together. You have the technology but are behind in tactics and training.



Name a country that has better training than the US Military?  Behind in tactics and training?  You've got to be kidding.  The only European country even comparable in training is the UK.

The American military dwarfs the European military in both size and capability.  The French, German and British Armies combined are about the size of the US Army.  There is no doubt that the US Army is heads and shoulders more capable and better trained.  Factor in the the USAF and USN, there is no contest. 

Those are the facts, so feel free to try and argue it.

 

Well the British/Australian SAS are generally considered to be the best in the world, and every single US special forces base their traing on SAS tactics and Training.

Plus The British can call on the Ghurkas from Nepal, considered some of the most fearsome fighters around.

And anyone knocking the Canadian miltitary needs to learn a few facts, Canadian soldiers are highly capable and are usually called into action to work with the British.

Some of the most succesfull special ops missions in world war 2 were carried out by Canadian and Australian commandos.

Noone mentions the Swiss or the swedish army, and they are not to be messed with either.

Eveyone knows America would overun most countries by sheer numbers and Technology, but if you matched up man for man you would struggle against a lot of countries.

Because your military is so large, each individual soldier has less time and money spent on his training, all those other countries invest a lot more time and effort into each soldier.

 










I like your view on the Australian Defense force

If it were realistic, once you died. The game disc would just blow up because. Your dead, you don't get a second chance.
   Report 

   02-04-2009, 3:29 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
I've always wanted a Star Wars version of Battlestations,
Imagine how fun it would be to swarm Rebel Mon Cals with TIE's launched from a SSD whilst Lancer class frigates cut Rebel Starfighter squadrons into mince meat... *drools*

And on to the crazed, rampant, "my country could *** your country in the quantum singularity" debate....

The main reason America is doing less than stellar in Iraq is quite simple.  America spent the last 50+ years training to fight the Ruskies on the plains of Germany in all out WWII style, mechanized warfare. Now, we've forced this army, trained in mechanized warfare, to fight an Urban conflict, and put limits on what it can and cannot do.

Hell, we could turn any city on Earth into a parking lot in less than 24 hours with conventional techniques but that would be immoral.

(yay joining the bandwagon! :P )

"I'm not a crook" -Richard Nixon
   Report 

   02-11-2009, 4:12 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
You should probably check the news more. Thing in the sand box are actually progressing quite well. We are actually letting the natives handle a lot of the work now. I was hoping to go back but I don't think ill be done with my current duty station in time.
   Report 

   04-03-2009, 6:05 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:
That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!


Big Smile [:D] I love people who post opinions based only on their gut feeling. You are dead wrong. The US is basically the only naval power in the world. Ranked the first in number of ships and soldiers. The us alone represents 53 % of the WORLDS navy. Just in case you were interested in informing yourself. The US navy has about 1559 ships. Japan has about 147. Infact Germany, France, UK, and Japan all combined have about 550. Thats not even half the US numbers. Still think they could kick our ***? FYI the second highest naval power is Russia sitting at 526 total ships.
   Report 

   04-03-2009, 7:17 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 Krytoses wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:
That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!


I love people who post opinions based only on their gut feeling. You are dead wrong. The US is basically the only naval power in the world. Ranked the first in number of ships and soldiers. The us alone represents 53 % of the WORLDS navy. Just in case you were interested in informing yourself. The US navy has about 1559 ships. Japan has about 147. Infact Germany, France, UK, and Japan all combined have about 550. Thats not even half the US numbers. Still think they could kick our ***? FYI the second highest naval power is Russia sitting at 526 total ships.





Actually the US only runs around 300 ships, and only around 15 of those are aircraft carriers.
Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 

   04-03-2009, 8:56 PM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 Krytoses wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:
That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!


I love people who post opinions based only on their gut feeling. You are dead wrong. The US is basically the only naval power in the world. Ranked the first in number of ships and soldiers. The us alone represents 53 % of the WORLDS navy. Just in case you were interested in informing yourself. The US navy has about 1559 ships. Japan has about 147. Infact Germany, France, UK, and Japan all combined have about 550. Thats not even half the US numbers. Still think they could kick our ***? FYI the second highest naval power is Russia sitting at 526 total ships.


i love people who reply to 2 month old dead posts.
   Report 

   04-04-2009, 12:30 AM
Reply Quote
Re: Battlestations : 2010
 Salem in Chains wrote:
 Krytoses wrote:
 ghostt888 wrote:

 Gosnork wrote:
That would be awesome!   I could sit on one side of the map, launch 1 missile at the shipyards and 1 missile at the airfields, do nothing and win!  Damn that would be a fun 30 seconds.  Select the sub click RB "nuke" then send it to the shipyards, repeat for airfields.   And just think, the japs wouldnt be able to detect your subs either!

Do you think Japan doesent have a modern navy too? China, Swedan and Norway all have some of the best navys in the world and probaley could defeat the modern American navy. Actually Germany, France, United Kingdom and Japan inculding the above could all kick the USA's navy's ***!


I love people who post opinions based only on their gut feeling. You are dead wrong. The US is basically the only naval power in the world. Ranked the first in number of ships and soldiers. The us alone represents 53 % of the WORLDS navy. Just in case you were interested in informing yourself. The US navy has about 1559 ships. Japan has about 147. Infact Germany, France, UK, and Japan all combined have about 550. Thats not even half the US numbers. Still think they could kick our ***? FYI the second highest naval power is Russia sitting at 526 total ships.


i love people who reply to 2 month old dead posts.




Especially when they come in thinking they know everything, and all they manage to do is show everyone how inaccurate they are.
Life, is what passes you by while you are to busy making plans

Maturity is overrated

   Report 
Page 8 of 9 (250 items)
« First ... < 5 6 7 8 9 >

©2009 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved