Re: What the picture perfect next gen console would be

Xbox forums
word bubble
join the conversation

Xbox General Discussion

Got Xbox/Xbox 360 stuff to talk about? Can't find a forum that fits? Then step up and post it here

What the picture perfect next gen console would be

  • rated by 0 users
  • This post has 23 Replies |
  • 1 Follower
    Level: 1
  • Okay, so as we all know, console gaming is not going to be anywhere near PC gaming anytime soon. But it's getting pretty powerful. I've heard things like 16 core processors and dual gpus for 720 and stuff which would be awesome but it has to support a couple things if it wants to really make a statement.

    1. Dual screening. You have been able to do this on pc for a while now. If you could do it on a console, or even incorporate a way to do 2 local players with seperate screens that would be awesome!

    2. Consistency. This was a HUGE problem with the 360. The constant red rings, the e74 everything.

    3. Better kinect integration. I'm sick and tired of all kinect being for voice in most major games. Like Mass Effect and Skyrim. I would love to play skyrim and swing a sword through the kinect. But I can't :(

    4. Cheaper. Not completely free, the reasoning behind paying for the Xbox Live Gold subscription is so that it can indepedantly fund itself, but I don't think it has to be this expensive. Maybe even every now and then a free 400 microsoft points for staying with Xbox. 
     

  • Level: 4
  • 100% focus on Games.  That would be perfect for me and none of this gimmick rubbish.

     RIP Bioware - EA Suck its in the name.

  • Level: 5
  • GERMIN4T0R:
    100% focus on Games

    this exactly,

    what is going to ruin the next gen is the 99% focus on apps and extras,its going that way already.

  • Level: 5
  • One with a Holographic Gaming Interface... The 3D HUD Is Holographic & shows it above console etc...  Similar, to what they use for area mapping, in that Avatar movie..

  • Level: 6
    ontopicGamerSpotlightAmbLevel10
  • Just focus on games. Maybe use a holo-disc. Lower the price of LIVE. 60 dollars is a lot. Exclusives. Let us use our own hdd. You can get a 1tb hdd cheaper than a 320 gb MS hdd.

  • Level: 5
  • Why would you need up to 1024GB of HDD space, for an XBOX console...??

  • Level: 6
    ontopicGamerSpotlightAmbLevel10
  • ^^If DD becomes more wide-spread next gen, then we will need it. My 250 gig is full. Everytime I want to install a game I have to delete things. The Witcher 2 took up 18 or 19 gigs. It's annoying sometimes.

  • Level: 2
  • I would really like to see the removal of pointless software limitations like being disallowed from reading/writing directly from NTFS USB volumes without the FATX layer (as an example, for backing up your savegames legitimately to your PC without having to use Modio). Being able to use your own hard drives, or at the very least, the removal of that stupid 16GB software limit on USB devices. I don't really care about the price of Xbox Live, but it would be really great if they could move away from the increasingly prohibitive DRM schemes for the games and from dumb gimmicks like Kinect et al and just focus on making some really badass games.



    I am also praying that the rumors about the Xbox Next refusing to read used discs is bogus.
  • Level: 4
    AmbLevel7
  • Xbox DURAGNO. - Google that. I say no more...

  • Level: 5
  • GERMIN4T0R:

    100% focus on Games.  That would be perfect for me and none of this gimmick rubbish.

    ^ THIS EXACTLY ^

     

    A complete focus on games (and not only Kinect titles). In fact, if Kinect is the standard controller, they might as well scrap the whole thing IMHO.

     

    No apps that have noting to do with games... Strike that, no apps at all. We need a game console, not a low end PC/smart phone/cable box/music server/social networking/popcorn popping crappbox.

    My Top-10 Games: Kights of the Old Republic  Final Fantasy VII  Resident Evil DC  Dragon Age Origins  Gran Turismo 4  Skies of Arcadia  Shenmue  Test Drive Unlimited  SNATCHER  Heavy Rain

  • Level: 5
    AVNetworkingguruontopic
  • OG Pooh:
    A complete focus on games
    That won't happen with MS or Sony. Both have a vested interest in media functionality on console. Only Nintendo has no real stake in the media market. We can see where that's gotten them so far...
    We need a game console,
    And you don't have one now?

     

    Adding functionality to a console does not mean core functionality is lost.

  • Level: 7
  • GERMIN4T0R:

    100% focus on Games.  That would be perfect for me and none of this gimmick rubbish.

    Agreed, and to add to that, reliability...



    In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king!

  • Level: 5
  • IceStorm III:

    OG Pooh:
    A complete focus on games
    That won't happen with MS or Sony. Both have a vested interest in media functionality on console. Only Nintendo has no real stake in the media market. We can see where that's gotten them so far...
    We need a game console,
    And you don't have one now?

     

    Adding functionality to a console does not mean core functionality is lost.

    Well, considering Nintendo has sold almost as many Wiis as the 360 & PS3 combined, your point has almost zero validity. That said, any shortcomings of the Wii are due to it's lack of power and overabundance of family & child oriented titles, rather than it failing to become the low end PC that the 360 is trying so hard to be.

     

    Core functionality may not be lost, but the purpose of the machine & the focus of it's manufacturer on it is. Maybe (just maybe) if Microsoft weren't spending all their time, effort & money on a bunch of unnecassary apps that everybody already has access to, the 360 would have some decent games that we couldn't get on other machines. I guess Microsoft is content having the 360 be every other machine's dumber, red-headed step-brother.

    My Top-10 Games: Kights of the Old Republic  Final Fantasy VII  Resident Evil DC  Dragon Age Origins  Gran Turismo 4  Skies of Arcadia  Shenmue  Test Drive Unlimited  SNATCHER  Heavy Rain

  • Level: 5
    AVNetworkingguruontopic
  • OG Pooh:
    Well, considering Nintendo has sold almost as many Wiis as the 360 & PS3 combined, your point has almost zero validity.
    If consoles existed in a vacuum, you may have a point. As consoles are hardware clients used to run games, you don't.

     

    Wii doesn't sell games outside first-party offerings. There's plenty of sholveware on the Wii, but it doesn't sell.

    Core functionality may not be lost, but the purpose of the machine & the focus of it's manufacturer on it is.
    I use my 360s almost exclusively for games. I see no dearth of titles, I've seen ever increasing hardware reliability and power reduction, and it still has the best controller of the three offerings. Where's this "lack of focus" you speak of?
    Maybe (just maybe) if Microsoft weren't spending all their time, effort & money
    By whose estimation is MS not spending money on the core gaming focus? A steady stream of timed exclusives seems to be telling you they aren't ignoring the gaming market.
    on a bunch of unnecassary apps that everybody already has access to,
    Except they don't in a set-top box, hence the 360's growing popularity with Gold customers as an entertainment hub.
    the 360 would have some decent games that we couldn't get on other machines.
    No, not at this point in console life cycle. There is zero incentive from publishers to single-platform titles. Middleware is mature. Not providing a PS3 and PC version of 360 games is a bad development move at this time.
    I guess Microsoft is content having the 360 be every other machine's dumber, red-headed step-brother.
    As an owner of an up to date gaming PC and several PS3s, I can safely say that if I want to game, the 360 is the fastest route to accomplishing that goal. No convoluted driver updates, no regular OS updates, no large system updates, no paying to keep my console updated in the background.

     

    As long as the next generation of MS console has the same ease of use and mandated patch/firmware size restrictions, I'm good.

  • Level: 5
  • No offense, but your responses would be much easier to dissect if you posted the entire quote, then responded in whole. I'll be brief & to the point...

     

    You're correct, consoles do not exist in a vacuum. That's why they don't need all the apps that Microsoft (and Sony to less of an extent) are throwing on them & at us. Maybe they don't exist all in one set-top box. If a jack-of-all trades, master of none idiot box is what you want, you've got one with the 360. Enjoy it.

     

    I thought I made it pretty clear that the lack of focus I'm talking about is on games... Specifically, exclusive games. Actually, it would seem I'm not the only one who shares this observation. I'd like to know where all these great exclusives you speak of, are. Maybe you're talking about what's coming out for Kinect. If that's where you're going, you can't exactly speak ill of the Wii, can you?

     

    What does it matter what point in the 360's lifecycle it's at? The PS3  (obviously) has all the multiplatform games that the 360 has, and a very good amount of AAA exclusives, including many still to come. Sure, Sony has apps (that you don't have to have a paid membership to access), but they also continue to focus on creating first party exclusives. First you say there is an abundance of timed 360 exclusives, then you go on to try and excuse & defend why there are none. Which is it?

    My Top-10 Games: Kights of the Old Republic  Final Fantasy VII  Resident Evil DC  Dragon Age Origins  Gran Turismo 4  Skies of Arcadia  Shenmue  Test Drive Unlimited  SNATCHER  Heavy Rain

  • Level: 5
  • OG Pooh:

    No offense, but your responses would be much easier to dissect if you posted the entire quote, then responded in whole. I'll be brief & to the point...

     

    You're correct, consoles do not exist in a vacuum. That's why they don't need all the apps that Microsoft (and Sony to less of an extent) are throwing on them & at us. Maybe they don't exist all in one set-top box. If a jack-of-all trades, master of none idiot box is what you want, you've got one with the 360. Enjoy it.

     

    I thought I made it pretty clear that the lack of focus I'm talking about is on games... Specifically, exclusive games. Actually, it would seem I'm not the only one who shares this observation. I'd like to know where all these great exclusives you speak of, are. Maybe you're talking about what's coming out for Kinect. If that's where you're going, you can't exactly speak ill of the Wii, can you?

     

    What does it matter what point in the 360's lifecycle it's at? The PS3  (obviously) has all the multiplatform games that the 360 has, and a very good amount of AAA exclusives, including many still to come. Sure, Sony has apps (that you don't have to have a paid membership to access), but they also continue to focus on creating first party exclusives. First you say there is an abundance of timed 360 exclusives, then you go on to try and excuse & defend why there are none. Which is it?

     
    OG, without trying to butt into your debate with someone else, I know you are getting more and more disatisfied with the 360 and the direction that MS is going with everything (me too to some extent), from an objective perspective, I am concerned about what the competition will be able to bring to the table.  Mainly with the Playstation side of the house.  I have been reading numerous reports of financial issues hitting Sony real hard right now, and I'm not so sure their platform is one to be sold off on 100% at this point.  Link  I know that is only one article, but its one of many I have been reading.  I'm no hater of the Playstation 3, I love competition.  The market needs it.  So before you put all your eggs into Sony, you might want to do a little research on the business side of things and see where Sony is going.  Hopefully not down the drain, and hopefully they don't get rid of the PS division but when times are tough from a financial side of things, anything is possible.

    I'm not as random as you think I salad.

Level: 5
AVNetworkingguruontopic
  • OG Pooh:
    That's why they don't need all the apps that Microsoft (and Sony to less of an extent) are throwing on them & at us.
    They aren't throwing anything at gamers. Gaming on the 360 is as easy now as it was in the past, if not easier. Either set the console to auto-boot whatever title is in the tray, or hit the A button after logging in.

     

    Because YOU do not want the extra media functions does not mean Live users do not in general. I don't use the media features often and I only own one series from Zune. I don't begrudge others who do use the console's media functions as you appear to..

    I thought I made it pretty clear that the lack of focus I'm talking about is on games...
    You have provided no proof that there's a lack of focus on games. Adding extra features does not mean focus on games is lost.
    Specifically, exclusive games.
    At this point in a console's life span, exclusivity is a NEGATIVE, not a positive. Devs and publishers making MORE money is better for everyone.
    Actually, it would seem I'm not the only one who shares this observation. I'd like to know where all these great exclusives you speak of, are.
    DLC and demos, mostly. Get out Google or Bing, type in XBOX 360 timed exclusives. MW3, Skyrim, RE6 demo, TMNT, Dragon's Dogma... Go through the list..
    What does it matter what point in the 360's lifecycle it's at?
    I said console life cycle, not the 360's life cycle.

     

    After about 2-3 years on the market, the middleware catches up. It's all good now. Rendering-wise, the experience on the PS3 and 360 is about the same. There's little technical reason, from a developer perspective, to go exclusive. Unreal Engine 3 on the 360, Unreal Engine 3 on the PS3 - does it really matter? The engine works very well on both.

    The PS3  (obviously) has all the multiplatform games that the 360 has, and a very good amount of AAA exclusives, including many still to come.
    Yeah... you say that, but... I've played exactly one exclusive on the PS3 in the past year, Infamous 2. Do you know why I don't bother to boot up Uncharted 3? It took me over an hour to get Infamous 2 "installed".
    they also continue to focus on creating first party exclusives.
    They do? Here's IGN's 2012 list for the PS3 and the 360.

  • Level: 5
  • Major Dihkface:

    Maybe even every now and then a free 400 microsoft points for staying with Xbox.

    Yeah, maybe an incentive, for loyalty to the XBOX LIVE! service... ie. The more years on LIVE!, the more incentives or exclusive content etc..

    ..

    Your Gamertag, is close to breaching the Code of Conduct too..

  • Level: 6
    AmbLevel6
  • The picture perfect next gen console would not have any of the problems that we get with the Xbox 360. Disc scratching, overheating, open tray error. There are going to be some problems that can happen but if you can eliminate these three it will be worth buying.

  • Level: 5
  • I know it would have more things to go wrong or break etc... But a Transformer LE Console would be aesthetically cool... Put it on it's side & pull out arms, legs & change the head / face or weapons that hold the console accessories etc.. 

  • Level: 6
    FoundingMember
  • IceStorm III:

    OG Pooh:
    That's why they don't need all the apps that Microsoft (and Sony to less of an extent) are throwing on them & at us.
    They aren't throwing anything at gamers. Gaming on the 360 is as easy now as it was in the past, if not easier. Either set the console to auto-boot whatever title is in the tray, or hit the A button after logging in.

     

    Because YOU do not want the extra media functions does not mean Live users do not in general. I don't use the media features often and I only own one series from Zune. I don't begrudge others who do use the console's media functions as you appear to..

    I thought I made it pretty clear that the lack of focus I'm talking about is on games...
    You have provided no proof that there's a lack of focus on games. Adding extra features does not mean focus on games is lost.
    Specifically, exclusive games.
    At this point in a console's life span, exclusivity is a NEGATIVE, not a positive. Devs and publishers making MORE money is better for everyone.
    Actually, it would seem I'm not the only one who shares this observation. I'd like to know where all these great exclusives you speak of, are.
    DLC and demos, mostly. Get out Google or Bing, type in XBOX 360 timed exclusives. MW3, Skyrim, RE6 demo, TMNT, Dragon's Dogma... Go through the list..
    What does it matter what point in the 360's lifecycle it's at?
    I said console life cycle, not the 360's life cycle.

     

    After about 2-3 years on the market, the middleware catches up. It's all good now. Rendering-wise, the experience on the PS3 and 360 is about the same. There's little technical reason, from a developer perspective, to go exclusive. Unreal Engine 3 on the 360, Unreal Engine 3 on the PS3 - does it really matter? The engine works very well on both.

    The PS3  (obviously) has all the multiplatform games that the 360 has, and a very good amount of AAA exclusives, including many still to come.
    Yeah... you say that, but... I've played exactly one exclusive on the PS3 in the past year, Infamous 2. Do you know why I don't bother to boot up Uncharted 3? It took me over an hour to get Infamous 2 "installed".
    they also continue to focus on creating first party exclusives.
    They do? Here's IGN's 2012 list for the PS3 and the 360.

     

    One question though. Of all the people who spent long hours in line to get theri hands on the system during launch and then again at Best Buys second launch, how many of them did it for media functions? Anybody i knew or talked to both on the internet as well as in line for 21 hours in 16 degree weather were talking about the games. There were very few media functions for a very long time. Everybody wanted to play their games.

     

    While yes their might be a lot of people who love their media functions (myself included), the reasons I bought the system to begin with are slowly becoming overshadowed with this third party stuff. Much of the stuff is becoming a useless waste of resources anyway. Especially since most new HDTVs, Blu-Ray players, Home Theaters and even DVD players are already coming prepacked with much of this software with no need of extra subscriptions. We are even reaching an age where you can stream this stuff straight from your cell phone to your TV. To watch something like Netflix on the Xbox 360, you have to pay twice to access it even though i already have three other ways to access it. With better quality software even. It's getting to the point where unless Xbox Live is the main part of your social life, you don't even need many of these apps. Now as this smart technology (especially with cell phones) advances even further, apps from your gaming console are going to become that much more pointless.

     

    Now you say that during this point in a consoles lifespan, exclusives are a negative thing? Now why is that? You say that the UE3 does not matter on either console yet in early 2005, Epic came out with an exclusive Xbox engine called the UEX2 which even made 360 games outperform many current gen PC games of the time even though it was running on extremely dated hardware. According to Epic back then, the exclusive development allowed them to do things they could not do otherwise because since everybody was running the exact same specs, they could tap into the consoles true potential. Ubisoft showed this as well even on the regular UE2 when the Exclusive Xbox version of Chaos Theory completely blew away even the PC. So now when is the best time during a consoles cycle for exclusives? In the early years when the attach rate resets back to zero and it becomes harder to sell games again? Sure. Why not. Lets just waste our great exclusives on a userbase that consists of 1 to 10 million gamers and just hope even 10% of them buy our game. Even MW3 sold to less than 20% of the audience. Gears 3 sold to about 8%.

  • Level: 5
    AVNetworkingguruontopic
  • Murderstyle75:
    Anybody i knew or talked to both on the internet as well as in line for 21 hours in 16 degree weather were talking about the games.
    Then they were deluded. The 360's launch lineup was awful. The first AAA title to hit the console was Gears of War. The first original title worth buying the console for was Dead Rising (and it pissed off people without HDTVs).
    the reasons I bought the system to begin with are slowly becoming overshadowed with this third party stuff.
    Why do you say that? Have you SEEN the laundry list of games coming out this year?
    Especially since most new HDTVs, Blu-Ray players, Home Theaters and even DVD players are already coming prepacked with much of this software with no need of extra subscriptions.
    Have you used those clients? They range from queue-only to partially servicable. They definitely aren't as smooth as the 360's offerings.
    We are even reaching an age where you can stream this stuff straight from your cell phone to your TV.
    Uh... I guess? It's a bit unwieldy to hook up a phone to a TV?
    To watch something like Netflix on the Xbox 360, you have to pay twice to access it even though i already have three other ways to access it. With better quality software even.
    Then... don't pay?
    It's getting to the point where unless Xbox Live is the main part of your social life, you don't even need many of these apps.
    That would be the point behind why they're adding the apps. They have a large active customer base. The apps and offerings help deliver content to those customers instead of those eyeballs wandering off to another place.
    apps from your gaming console are going to become that much more pointless.
    But you can argue that for any device. Why are you cabling a PHONE to your TV to watch movies? Why would you suffer the slow speed of a Blu-ray player's Netflix client when there's a fast client on the 360?
    Now you say that during this point in a consoles lifespan, exclusives are a negative thing? Now why is that?
    Thought that was pretty clear - middleware is mature. There's little to gain by being exclusive if the middleware is suitable.
    You say that the UE3 does not matter on either console yet in early 2005, Epic came out with an exclusive Xbox engine called the UEX2 which even made 360 games outperform many current gen PC games of the time even though it was running on extremely dated hardware.
    Uh, no. UE2X was an original XBOX engine and helped make Unreal Championship 2 look as good as first generation 360 titles. The optimizations included with UE2X were incorporated into UE3.
    According to Epic back then, the exclusive development allowed them to do things they could not do otherwise because since everybody was running the exact same specs, they could tap into the consoles true potential.
    You're comparing a final stage XBOX engine on last generation hardware to seasoned middleware on an extended cycle for this generation.

     

    The XBOX lasted four years. We're now in year seven of the 360's lifespan and year six of the PS3's lifespan. Yes, optimizing for one console will work, but that has to be weighed against the monetary losses going single-platform may result in. This generation's middleware is cleary quite mature and capable, so... why go single platform?

    So now when is the best time during a consoles cycle for exclusives?
    When the middleware isn't able to deliver the performance desired.

  • Level: 6
    FoundingMember
  • Well perhaps to 3rd party developers and publishers, it doesnt really matter that much because they will just go where the users are but to a console maker, it should mean so much more. I mean being a launch Xbox 1 owner and a Best Buy second launch 360 owner, I should be jumping up and down with the anticipation of the new console. For the first time since this brand has existed though, I am not sure I really even care. Now the lack of exclusives seems to be the most popular debate on this website, Team Xbox and pretty much every other board out there which tells me I am far from alone in my thoughts. That could be dangerous because whether it is on the Playstation or Xbox, people are going to play their COD, Elder Scrolls and Mass Effect. It's the other titles, namely 1st party games that make most favor one console over the other. Capture a stronger userbase based on your library of games and you can bet many of these <place popular titles here> will become exclusive as well. It never hurt Rockstar to keep GTA3 and Vice City exclusive to Sony for the majority of last generation. Are you really that confident that a bland extended generation could not have a really bad effect on next gen sales? And its not even just a bland extended generation because with the exception of Gears, the few exclusives we have seen in a very long time came from the original console which are Fable, Forza and Halo.

     

    Now what do I really have to look forward to for the rest of this generation on the 360 besides Kinect games, XBLA games and multiplats? Even the next Forza game is an XBLA title and the next Fable is a Kinect game on rails. If you look at the PS3 on the other hand, Naughty Dog is doing much more than another sequal with their new IP "The Last of Us" but Sony has Starhawk, The Last Guardian, LBP Karting, Sly Cooper, Agent which is a PS3 exclusive by Rockstar, FFXIV MMO which will not be making its way to the 360, etc. Now for being a dedicated Xbox gamer for over a decade now, why should I be looking at Sony games and thinking WTF?

     

    As for the smartphone and slower netflix on Blu-Ray? I see your point however you are only thinking current specs. This tech keeps evolving every day and I believe that in the not so far future, this is going to become a very stable standard and will probably be completely wireless. I just really think Microsoft is wasting their time with the whole app thing while turning their backs on their games.

  • Level: 5
    AVNetworkingguruontopic
  • Murderstyle75:
    a Best Buy second launch 360 owner
    I felt sorry for all you poor sods who got stuck in the rain with all the cuts in line. I pre-ordered my 360 a week after E3 2005 at my local GameStop. I was #3. No "pre-order" lines for me (though I did go with friends to Best Buy for moral support). After the fiasco that was the PS2 launch, I knew the 360 would be worse.
    It's the other titles, namely 1st party games that make most favor one console over the other.
    Maybe if you have lots of time on your hands that's true. I buy multi-platform on the 360 because it just works. PS3 you have to patch and patch and install and patch some more...
    Are you really that confident that a bland extended generation could not have a really bad effect on next gen sales?
    With respect to exclusives? No, I don't see that happening. Microsoft gets big-name DLC ahead of their competitors and they have some nice exclusives this year.
    Now what do I really have to look forward to for the rest of this generation on the 360 besides Kinect games, XBLA games and multiplats?
    Fez, Trials Evolution, Minecraft, Halo 4, COD DLC first, Demos first, etc.
    If you look at the PS3 on the other hand,
    I see The Last Of Us, The Last Guardian, and maybe Dust 514. The rest? Meh.
    Now for being a dedicated Xbox gamer for over a decade now, why should I be looking at Sony games and thinking WTF?
    it's your decision not to own both platforms. Like I said, I own the PS3. I have yet to play Uncharted 3...
    I just really think Microsoft is wasting their time with the whole app thing while turning their backs on their games.
    As you say, the smartphones of the future have the power of today's consoles. As MS has a vested interest in the smartphone space, I see no reason to believe that the apps of today will not lay the foundation of the apps tomorrow.

     

    They're going to do it anyway. It doesn't really matter where they start.

  • Page 1 of 1 (24 items)